DGGI Meerut | Court Sends Delhi-Based GST Accused to 14-Day Judicial Remand in Rs. 75 Crore Fake ITC Case

HomeGSTDGGI Meerut | Court Sends Delhi-Based GST Accused to 14-Day Judicial Remand...

DGGI Meerut | Court Sends Delhi-Based GST Accused to 14-Day Judicial Remand in Rs. 75 Crore Fake ITC Case

GST Top Stories

Published on

16/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

DGGI Meerut | Court Sends Delhi-Based GST Accused to 14-Day Judicial Remand in Rs. 75 Crore Fake ITC Case

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Court of the Remand Magistrate/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, on Thursday granted 14 days’ judicial remand of Sandeep Singhal, a Delhi-based businessman, in a major GST evasion and fake input tax credit (ITC) fraud case involving approximately Rs. 75 crore. The remand was granted in Case No. 1629/2025 registered by the Directorate General of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Judicial Remand

DGGI Meerut | Court Sends Delhi-Based GST Accused to 14-Day Judicial Remand in Rs. 75 Crore Fake ITC Case

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

Movement of Goods to Depots for Inventory Replenishment Can’t Be Treated as Inter-State Sale: CESTAT

Customs Broker Can’t Be Penalised for Export of Ergotamine Preparation; S. 117 Not Invocable Where Specific Penalty Provision Exists: CESTAT

Dept. Appeal Doesn’t Automatically Stay Appellate Order; GST Registration Restoration Directions Must Be Followed Without Specific Stay: Allahabad HC

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

Movement of Goods to Depots for Inventory Replenishment Can’t Be Treated as Inter-State Sale: CESTAT

Customs Broker Can’t Be Penalised for Export of Ergotamine Preparation; S. 117 Not Invocable Where Specific Penalty Provision Exists: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories