HomeGSTMumbai Court Grants Bail to Businessman Accused of ₹13.48 Crore GST Input...

Mumbai Court Grants Bail to Businessman Accused of ₹13.48 Crore GST Input Tax Credit Fraud

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Esplanade Court, Mumbai has granted bail to businessman Jitendra Chandulal Jain, director of New Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., who was arrested for allegedly availing and passing on fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) worth ₹26.65 crore under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act. 

According to the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Mumbai Zonal Unit, Jain allegedly availed ineligible ITC of ₹13.48 crore using forged invoices and further passed on ₹13.17 crore of such credit to beneficiary firms. He was arrested on October 30, 2025, following search and seizure operations at his business premises.

DGGI argued against bail, claiming that Jain had not disclosed the alleged reversals before his arrest and that despite partial reversal, his criminal liability remained. The agency further contended that releasing him could lead to tampering with evidence or absconding.

Dr. Sujay Kantawala, the counsel for the accused, submitted that he is a permanent resident of Mumbai and director of an infrastructure company. The case is entirely documentary, and all records have already been seized. He has no criminal antecedents. He has already reversed ₹9.10 crore of the disputed ITC. Custodial interrogation is complete, making continued detention unnecessary.

The court noted that the allegations were serious but the investigation was largely documentary. Jain has been in custody since October 30, 2025. The DGGI has already seized necessary documents and recorded his statement. No prior criminal history was cited by the agency. Offences under the GST law are compoundable and triable by the magistrate. Stringent conditions could sufficiently address concerns of absconding or interference.

The court concluded that Jain’s further physical custody is not necessary for the investigation.

Jain was granted bail subject to various conditions.

Firstly, PR bond of ₹2 lakh with one or two sureties. Provisional release permitted on cash bail of ₹2 lakh for two months. He must not influence witnesses or tamper with evidence. Must cooperate with the investigation and appear when called. Must surrender his passport to DGGI for six months. Court permission required for foreign travel. Must provide residential address, contact details, and details of two close relatives.

The court clarified that the DGGI must return Jain’s passport after six months with due acknowledgment.

Case Details

Case Title: Shri. Jitendra Chandulal Jain Versus Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI, Mumbai Zonal Unit 

Case No.: R. A. NO. 907 OF 2025

Date:  20.11.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Dr. Sujay Kantawala

Counsel For Respondent: Special PP Ms. Punde 

Read More: Municipalities Lost Legislative Authority To Levy Advertisement Tax After GST Regime: Allahabad HC Quashes Demand

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the Institute of Chartered...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a...

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has upheld the...

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

The Delhi High Court has set aside reassessment proceedings and a Rs. 96.04 crore...

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the Institute of Chartered...

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has set aside a...

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has upheld the...