COST OF EXECUTION WORK FOR ELECTRIC LINES INSTALLATION BORNE BY SERVICE RECIPIENT GST PAYABLE ONLY ON SUPERVISORY SERVICES
COST OF EXECUTION WORK FOR ELECTRIC LINES INSTALLATION BORNE BY SERVICE RECIPIENT GST PAYABLE ONLY ON SUPERVISORY SERVICES

Author: Khushi J Prajapati

The Uttar Pradesh Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that GST is applicable only on supervision charge fees when the value of materials and cost of execution was borne by the service recipient.

The AAR held that GST is applicable only on supervision fees when the recipient bears the cost of materials and installation. The work contract services provided by an independent contractor are classified under section 9954 distinct from services provided by Electricity Distribution Company.

 AAR found that the fees charged for the supervision by UPPTCL are composite supplies under Section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017 which involve both goods and services. The authorities noted that since these supervision services were part and parcel of the installation process itself, GST assessment purposes needed to include in taxable value all the input materials and construction costs incurred by the recipient. It further stated that not considering these expenses while calculating taxable amounts would neither present a proper reflection on certain characteristics of composite supply nor comply with provisions of GST law.

 In this connection, it emphasized that the full amount including values of materials and execution works should be taken into account for adequate GST evaluation under Section 15 of CGST Act, 2017.

Facts

M/s Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Limited (UPPTCL) sought an advance ruling to determine whether the value of materials and the cost of execution work for installing electrical lines, borne by the recipient, should be included in the taxable value under GST when the applicant charges only supervision fees. The applicant, responsible for transmission infrastructure development, raised this query to clarify the tax liability.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Limited (AAR Uttar Pradesh)

Appeal Number: Advance Ruling No. UP ADRG 04/2024

Date of Judgement/Order: 12/06/2024

Court: Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) Uttar Pradesh

Download Order

Juris Hour Team
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like
Gujarat High Court Upholds Rs.1.7 Crore Utilised ITC Refund for Patanjali Foods, Rejects Dept.'s Recovery

Gujarat High Court Upholds Rs.1.7 Crore Utilised ITC Refund for Patanjali Foods, Rejects Dept.’s Recovery

In a major relief to Patanjali Foods, the Gujarat High Court has…

GSTN: Biometric-Based Aadhaar Authentication For GST Registration In Jharkhand And Andaman And Nicobar Islands

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has issued the advisory for…

GST Registration Rejection Over Missed Call? Nation Wants to Know Why Google Maps Isn’t Enough

Applicant mocks flawed address verification system as GST registration faces rejection due…
Jharkhand High Court Allows Rs. 1.23 Crores GST Refund With Interest To Tata Steel, Lays Down Principles

Jharkhand High Court Allows Rs. 1.23 Crores GST Refund With Interest To Tata Steel, Lays Down Principles

The Jharkhand High Court has allowed Rs. 1.23 crores GST refund with…