HomeGSTCGST Delhi South Commissionerate Arrests Smartphone Trader’s Director in Rs. 60.59 Crore...

CGST Delhi South Commissionerate Arrests Smartphone Trader’s Director in Rs. 60.59 Crore Fake ITC Fraud

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Anti-Evasion Branch of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST), Delhi South Commissionerate, has arrested a director of a private limited company involved in trading smartphones for allegedly availing fake ITC worth Rs. 60.59 crore using bogus invoices amounting to Rs. 397.23 crore.

According to officials, the fraudulent availment of ITC constitutes a violation of Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 and attracts penal provisions under Section 132 of the Act.

The investigation began after a detailed analysis of GST return data raised suspicion regarding the transactions reported by the company. Subsequent verification of the supplier entity’s declared place of business revealed that the premises was merely a co-working space. Authorities found no books of accounts, stock, invoices, or any other records indicating genuine business activity at the location.

During questioning, the director failed to provide a satisfactory explanation regarding the functioning of the firm or the payment mechanism for the purported transactions. Investigators also could not establish any verifiable payment trail corresponding to the alleged supply of goods. Officials believe that the transactions were non-genuine and were carried out only on paper to facilitate fraudulent passing and utilization of ITC.

Authorities stated that the arrested director was the direct beneficiary of the alleged tax evasion. The offence falls under Section 132(1)(c) and is punishable under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Following the arrest, the accused was produced before the Duty Magistrate, who remanded him to judicial custody for 14 days.

Officials also highlighted that the CGST Delhi South Commissionerate has intensified enforcement actions during the current financial year and has already launched prosecutions against 45 individuals involved in tax fraud under the CGST Act, 2017.

Read More: Call Centre Services Provided to Foreign Client Qualify as Export: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Used Gas-Cut Drill Pipes Can’t Be Treated as Restricted Second-Hand Goods Without Evidence: CESTAT Allows Heavy Melting Scrap Import

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh has set aside confiscation...

NCLAT Upholds Bharti Telecom’s Selective Capital Reduction; Allows Squeeze-Out of Minority Shareholders at Rs. 196.80 per Share

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has upheld the legality of Bharti Telecom...

Blanket Freezing of Bank Accounts Violates Fundamental Rights: Rajasthan High Court 

The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that freezing a citizen’s bank account without providing...

Raghav Chadha Calls for Expansion of ‘Udaan Yatri Cafes’ Across All Airports, Seeks Placement Inside Departure Areas

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha on Tuesday raised...

More like this

Used Gas-Cut Drill Pipes Can’t Be Treated as Restricted Second-Hand Goods Without Evidence: CESTAT Allows Heavy Melting Scrap Import

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh has set aside confiscation...

NCLAT Upholds Bharti Telecom’s Selective Capital Reduction; Allows Squeeze-Out of Minority Shareholders at Rs. 196.80 per Share

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has upheld the legality of Bharti Telecom...

Blanket Freezing of Bank Accounts Violates Fundamental Rights: Rajasthan High Court 

The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that freezing a citizen’s bank account without providing...