Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTBombay High Court Quashes GST Show Cause Notice To Wrong Address

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Show Cause Notice To Wrong Address

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court quashed the GST show cause notice in the interest of justice as the department failed to show the proof of service of notice at the correct address of the petitioner and remanded the matter back to the file of the department for adjudication of the show cause notice. 

The bench of Justice M. S. Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain directed the GST department to serve further notices and correspondence to the petitioner on the address at “M/s. Champion Steel Industries (P) Ltd., A/3, Ahmedabad Street, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai – 400 009” and at the email address registered with the department.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged the show cause notice culminating into Order primarily on the ground of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner submitted that the show cause notices and order have been served on an address which does not belong to the petitioner and, therefore on this ground itself, the order passed on the basis of such notice which was not served is bad in law.

The department submitted they have issued the notices at the address mentioned in the show cause notice and order and same were not returned and, therefore, it should be presumed that the notice has been served on the petitioner and, therefore, there is no violation of principles of natural justice.

The court noted that the address records a wrong pin code number and wrong road and area. Then how this notice can be said to have been served on the petitioner whose office is at the address of “A/3, Ahmedabad Street, Carnac Bunder, Mumbai – 400 009” and not at Pydhonie. The department failed to shown any document to indicate that the Pydhonie address is that of the petitioner.

Case Details

Case Title: Champions Steel Industries Private Limited Versus Union of India: Bombay High Court

Case No.: Writ Petition (L) No.35234 Of 2023

Date: 16 December 2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Mr. Prasanna Namboodiri a/w Ms. Pratibha Namboodiri, Ms. Tejal S. Darekar, Ms. Pallavi Dabak and Mr. Rishabh Jain

Counsel For Respondent: Mr. Yogendra R. Mishra a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav 

Click Here To Read Order

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied Without Evidence of Inputs Exclusively Used for Manufacturing By-Product: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, has held that CENVAT...

Customs Refund Limitation Runs From Date of Communication of Final Assessment Order, Not Date of Passing: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CESTAT Allows Customs Duty Exemption on Reliance Industries’ Imported MEG Reclamation Plant for Petroleum Operations

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Factory Setup Services Qualify for CENVAT Credit Despite Deletion of ‘Setting Up’ From Definition: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, has held that services...

More like this

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied Without Evidence of Inputs Exclusively Used for Manufacturing By-Product: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, has held that CENVAT...

Customs Refund Limitation Runs From Date of Communication of Final Assessment Order, Not Date of Passing: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CESTAT Allows Customs Duty Exemption on Reliance Industries’ Imported MEG Reclamation Plant for Petroleum Operations

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...