HomeGSTBMW Entitled To ITC On Demo Vehicles: Punjab & Haryana High Court...

BMW Entitled To ITC On Demo Vehicles: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes AAAR’s Ruling

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab and Haryana High Court while quashing the ruling given by Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) held that BMW is entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) on demo vehicles.

The bench of Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjay Vashisth has observed that Circular No.231/25-HGST/2024/GST-II (CBIC Circular No.231/25/2024- GST, dated 11.09.2024), dated 13th September 2024 discussed the availability of Input Tax Credit on demo vehicles, which are motor vehicles for transportation of passengers having approved seating capacity of not more than 13 persons in terms of clause (a) of section 17(5) of Haryana Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017.

Circular No.231/25/2024-GST

A clarification of availability of Input Tax Credit in respect of demo vehicles, has been issued vide Circular No.231/25/2024-GST (F.NO.CBIC-20001/6/2024-GST], dated 10.09.2024.

The circular deals with the availability of input tax credit on demo vehicles in cases where such vehicles are capitalised in the books of account by the authorised dealers.

As per the circular the availability of input tax credit on demo vehicles is not affected by way of capitalization of such vehicles in the books of account of the authorised dealers, subject to other provisions of the Act.

In case of capitalization of demo vehicles, availability of input tax credit would be subject to provisions of section 16(3) of CGST Act, which provides that where the registered person has claimed depreciation on the tax component of the cost of capital goods and plant and machinery under the Income-tax Act, 1961, the input tax credit on the said tax component shall not be allowed. 

It is further mentioned that in case demo vehicle, which is capitalised, is subsequently sold by the authorised dealer, the authorised dealer shall have to pay an amount or tax as per provisions of section 18(6) of CGST Act read with rule 44(6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017.

Conclusion

The court held that the observations of not giving benefit of Input Tax Credit to vehicles, which have been initially used as demo vehicles, is accordingly, set-aside in view of the extension of grant of availability of Input Tax Credit with respect to the demo vehicles, as clarified by the circulars.

Read More: CBIC Notifies Extension Of Due Date For Filing Of Return In FORM GSTR-3B October, 2024 Till 21 November, 2024

Case Details

Case Title: M/s BMW India Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for the State of Haryana and another

Case No.: CWP-7235-2022

Date: 12.11.2024 

Counsel For Petitioner: Priyanka Rathi

Counsel For Respondent: Mamta Singla Talwar

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Mere Facilitation of Customs Clearance Can’t Establish Knowledge of Smuggling: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has held that mere facilitation of customs clearance cannot establish...

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Ignore Documents, Furnished by Assessee While Making Unexplained-Credit Addition: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the income tax department cannot ignore documents,...

Delhi High Court Declines to Revisit CENVAT Credit Evidence, Holds Judicial Review of Settlement Commission Orders Narrow

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of the...

Settled Customs Dispute Can’t Be Reopened Through Article 226 Challenge to Interest Liability: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that a party which consciously opts to settle...

More like this

Mere Facilitation of Customs Clearance Can’t Establish Knowledge of Smuggling: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has held that mere facilitation of customs clearance cannot establish...

Income Tax Dept. Can’t Ignore Documents, Furnished by Assessee While Making Unexplained-Credit Addition: Delhi High Court 

The Delhi High Court has held that the income tax department cannot ignore documents,...

Delhi High Court Declines to Revisit CENVAT Credit Evidence, Holds Judicial Review of Settlement Commission Orders Narrow

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of the...