Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTSGST Dept. Can’t Hear Appeal Against CGST Order: Calcutta HC

SGST Dept. Can’t Hear Appeal Against CGST Order: Calcutta HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has set aside an appellate order passed by a State GST authority in a matter arising from an adjudication order issued by the Central GST authorities. 

The bench of Justice Smita Das De remanded the appeal to the competent appellate authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for fresh disposal.

Buy Now: 195+ ITC Judgements Along With GSTAT Rulings – 2017 To 2026

The central issue was whether an appellate authority under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act could decide an appeal against an adjudication order passed by a proper officer under the CGST Act.

The company challenged the State appellate authority’s order dated February 12, 2025. It argued that where the original adjudication was undertaken by the Central GST authorities, the appeal must also be heard and decided by the Central appellate authority under the CGST Act.

The company relied on principles of jurisdictional propriety and consistency, submitting that the State appellate authority’s exercise of jurisdiction was contrary to the position recognised in earlier decisions of the High Court. It sought quashing of the appellate order and remand of the matter to the competent Central GST appellate authority.

Counsel appearing for the Central GST authorities, the Union of India and the State conceded the legal position advanced by the company. They did not oppose remand on the grounds of propriety and consistency.

The Court quashed the order dated February 12, 2025, and remanded the matter to the appellate authority under the CGST Act, 2017.

The Court directed the Central GST appellate authority to dispose of the appeal within eight weeks from the date of communication of its order. The authority must provide the company an opportunity of personal hearing and pass a reasoned, speaking order in accordance with law.

The decision must be communicated within one week thereafter. The Court also directed the company not to seek unnecessary adjournments during the appellate proceedings.

All points were left open for determination by the Central GST appellate authority, which must decide the matter without being influenced by observations in the High Court’s order. The ruling therefore resolves the question of the appropriate appellate forum while leaving the underlying dispute open for fresh consideration. 

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Income Tax Dept. Drops Proposed ₹17.32 Crore Addition After Reviewing Taxpayer’s Documents

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Income Tax Dept. Drops Proposed ₹17.32 Crore Addition After Reviewing Taxpayer’s Documents

The Income Tax Department has completed a search-linked block assessment without making any addition...

Godown Rent Attracts 18% GST Even When Used Exclusively For Exempt Agricultural Warehousing: AAR

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that rent paid for godowns...

GST Demand Passed Ignoring Filed Reply Quashed; Bank Attachment to Be Lifted on 10% Deposit: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST demand order that recorded that...

Can Earlier GST Proceedings Confer Territorial Jurisdiction To Challenge Parallel Probes And Bank Attachment In Another State? Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has declined to entertain a company’s petition challenging alleged parallel...

More like this

Income Tax Dept. Drops Proposed ₹17.32 Crore Addition After Reviewing Taxpayer’s Documents

The Income Tax Department has completed a search-linked block assessment without making any addition...

Godown Rent Attracts 18% GST Even When Used Exclusively For Exempt Agricultural Warehousing: AAR

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that rent paid for godowns...

GST Demand Passed Ignoring Filed Reply Quashed; Bank Attachment to Be Lifted on 10% Deposit: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST demand order that recorded that...