HomeGSTAuto-Populated Values in GSTR-3B Table 3.2 to Become Non-Editable from July 2025

Auto-Populated Values in GSTR-3B Table 3.2 to Become Non-Editable from July 2025

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has issued an important advisory notifying that, effective from the July 2025 tax period, Table 3.2 of the GSTR-3B return form will be auto-populated and non-editable. This move aims to enhance data consistency and reduce manual errors in tax reporting.

From the notified period onwards, inter-State supply details reported in GSTR-3B Table 3.2 will be system-generated based on data filed in GSTR-1 and IFF (Invoice Furnishing Facility) returns. Taxpayers will only be able to file GSTR-3B using these auto-filled values, with no option to manually alter the figures.

How to Correct Errors?

If any discrepancies are found in the auto-populated data, taxpayers must correct them using:

  • Form GSTR-1A, or
  • Amendments in subsequent GSTR-1 or IFF returns

This ensures that any rectifications are reflected in the system before GSTR-3B is filed.

Who Will Be Affected?

The change impacts businesses making inter-State supplies to:

  • Unregistered Persons
  • Composition Dealers
  • UIN (Unique Identification Number) Holders

These categories are specifically linked to Table 3.2, and hence are subject to the auto-population rule.

Filing Guidance

Taxpayers are advised that Form GSTR-1A can be submitted any time after filing GSTR-1 and before GSTR-3B, to ensure any necessary corrections are incorporated before final submission.

Industry Impact

Tax professionals and business owners are urged to review their return filing process in light of this change. Experts believe the move will streamline data reconciliation but caution that awareness and timely corrections are critical to avoid filing mismatches.

Read More: GST Council May Hike Turnover Limit for GST Registration to Provide Relief to Small Businesses

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Compensation for Delayed Possession Of Flats To Homebuyers Can’t Be Limited by One-Sided Builder Clauses: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of consumer forums to award fair compensation...

Extended Limitation Not Invocable Without Suppression: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Online Advertisement

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS Unsustainable When Underlying Services Are Exempt: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

SEBI Suspends General Manager in Vigilance Case Linked to SME IPO Probe

In a significant internal development, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has...

More like this

Compensation for Delayed Possession Of Flats To Homebuyers Can’t Be Limited by One-Sided Builder Clauses: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of consumer forums to award fair compensation...

Extended Limitation Not Invocable Without Suppression: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Online Advertisement

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS Unsustainable When Underlying Services Are Exempt: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...