Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Council May Hike Turnover Limit for GST Registration to Provide Relief...

GST Council May Hike Turnover Limit for GST Registration to Provide Relief to Small Businesses

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The 56th meeting of the GST Council is expected to deliberate on a major relief measure for small businesses: increasing the annual turnover threshold for mandatory GST registration. This move comes in response to widespread protests and grievances from small traders who recently received GST-related notices across several states.

Currently, businesses are required to register under GST if their annual turnover exceeds ₹20 lakh for services and ₹40 lakh for goods. However, sources suggest that the Council may propose a significant hike—raising the threshold to ₹50 lakh for services and ₹1 crore for goods.

States like Uttar Pradesh and Karnataka have taken the lead in discussions with the Centre, highlighting the hardships faced by micro and small enterprises that were pulled into the tax net due to low turnover limits. Officials familiar with the matter said the objective is to shield genuine small vendors from unnecessary compliance burdens.

“The GST regime was meant to simplify taxation for businesses, not to strangle small players in red tape,” said a senior government official. “With inflation and business costs rising since 2017, the current turnover thresholds are outdated.”

It is worth noting that businesses with annual turnover up to ₹1.5 crore are already eligible to opt for the composition scheme, under which they pay a flat 1% tax and enjoy simplified compliance. However, registration under this scheme is still mandatory for those crossing the lower threshold, which has triggered the recent wave of notices and confusion.

The proposed revision in limits, if accepted, would represent the first such major change since GST’s rollout in 2017. It could potentially exclude lakhs of small vendors from the GST ambit, saving them from the compliance maze and regulatory scrutiny.

The 56th GST Council meeting is expected to be held in early August, and a final decision will be announced thereafter.

Read More: ITR Not Conclusive Proof of Income: Calcutta High Court Hikes Maintenance to Estranged Wife

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...

Income Tax Officer Can’t Use Last-Minute Valuation Reference to Extend Assessment Limitation: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has quashed an Income Tax Department reference made to the...

More like this

Documentary Evidence Dominates Probe, Further Custody Unwarranted: Mumbai Court Grants Bail in Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to a 24-year-old businessman arrested by the Directorate...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Form 26AS and Profit and Loss Account; Director’s Salary Not Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside a...

Service Tax Appeal Filed Beyond Statutory Three-Month Limit Can’t Be Entertained: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has held that the...