GST Appeal Limitation | Appellate Authority Powerless to Condone Delay Beyond Statute, But Writ Court Can: Rajasthan HC

HomeGSTGST Appeal Limitation | Appellate Authority Powerless to Condone Delay Beyond Statute,...

GST Appeal Limitation | Appellate Authority Powerless to Condone Delay Beyond Statute, But Writ Court Can: Rajasthan HC

GST

Published on

17/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

GST Appeal Limitation | Appellate Authority Powerless to Condone Delay Beyond Statute, But Writ Court Can: Rajasthan HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench has held that while appellate authorities are bound by the strict limitation period prescribed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, the High Court can intervene in writ jurisdiction to condone delay where the facts disclose a reasonable and bona fide cause. The…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
GST Appeal Limitation

GST Appeal Limitation | Appellate Authority Powerless to Condone Delay Beyond Statute, But Writ Court Can: Rajasthan HC

Membership Required

Latest articles

Criminal Case Against Widow Can’t Automatically Block Son’s Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court

Falling Tree Branch Not Motor Accident, Yet Victim Awarded ₹25 Lakh Compensation: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Protects Child Victim from Repeated Psychological Evaluation; Sets Aside Bombay High Court’s Multi-Expert Panel Order

Fresh SCN Mandatory Before Punishment if Misconduct is Proved Through De Novo Proceedings After Defective Inquiry: Supreme Court

More like this

Criminal Case Against Widow Can’t Automatically Block Son’s Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court

Falling Tree Branch Not Motor Accident, Yet Victim Awarded ₹25 Lakh Compensation: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Protects Child Victim from Repeated Psychological Evaluation; Sets Aside Bombay High Court’s Multi-Expert Panel Order

About us

Company

Categories