HomeGSTAndhra Pradesh High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders Citing Absence Of AO’s...

Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders Citing Absence Of AO’s Signature And DIN Number 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has quashed the GST assessment orders citing absence of the signature of Assessing Officer and non-mentioning of the DIN number in the assessment order.

The bench of Justice R Raghunandan Rao and Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam has set aside the assessment orders in Form GST DRC-0 issued by the department, with liberty to conduct fresh assessment, after giving notice and by assigning a signature to the orders.

The petitioner/assessee was served with assessment orders in Form GST DRC-07 passed by the department, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 for the period 2018-19 to 2020-21 respectively. 

These assessment orders, in Form GST DRC-07, are challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the ground that the said proceedings does not contain the signature of the assessing officer and also DIN number on the impugned assessment orders.

The department submitted that there are no signatures of the assessing officer and does not contain DIN numbers, on the assessment orders.

The court held that the signature, on the assessment order, cannot be dispensed with and that the provisions of Sections-160 & 169 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, would not rectify such a defect. The court allowed the appeal.

Read More: ICAI Announces Empanelment Of Chartered Accountant Firms/LLPs For Year 2025-2026

Case Details

Case Title: Sd Exports Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Case No.: Writ Petition No: 31388/2024

Date: 31.12.2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Peddibhotla Venkata Sai Rajesh

Counsel For Respondent: GP

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 29, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 29, 2026.GSTGST Not Leviable on Affiliation...

Service Tenure Can Be Curtailed Without It Being Punitive If Order Is Non-Stigmatic: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the curtailment of tenure of a senior अधिकारी, holding...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 33.78 Crore Excise Demand on Home Appliances, Rules Extended Limitation Not Invocable

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

No Writ in GST Refund Rejection; Assessee Must Approach GSTAT: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere in a GST refund dispute filed...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 29, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 29, 2026.GSTGST Not Leviable on Affiliation...

Service Tenure Can Be Curtailed Without It Being Punitive If Order Is Non-Stigmatic: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the curtailment of tenure of a senior अधिकारी, holding...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 33.78 Crore Excise Demand on Home Appliances, Rules Extended Limitation Not Invocable

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...