Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTAmount Paid Towards GST Liability During Investigation Can’t Be Adjusted Towards Pre...

Amount Paid Towards GST Liability During Investigation Can’t Be Adjusted Towards Pre Deposit: Telangana HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Telangana High Court has held that the amount paid towards the tax liability during investigation cannot be adjusted as against pre-deposit to be made for the purposes of preferring the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

The bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G.M. Mohiuddin has directed the petitioner firm to deposit 10% of the penalty amount within a period of eight weeks from today. If the petitioner firm makes such pre-deposit within the aforesaid period, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner firm till the decision of the Appellate Tribunal in the appeal to be filed. 

The petitioner, Annai Infra Developers had approached the High Court challenging the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Tax (Appeals), which upheld a penalty imposed on the company by the adjudicating authority. The penalty, however, did not involve any tax demand.

During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner argued that the company should be permitted to adjust amounts earlier paid through Form GST DRC-03 (during investigation) towards the mandatory pre-deposit for filing appeal before the Tribunal.

The Court took note of the fact that the Goods & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has now commenced functioning and has issued a schedule on September 24, 2025, specifying the timelines for filing appeals depending on the date of orders passed by appellate authorities.

Since the impugned order-in-appeal was issued on 26.08.2025, the company can file its appeal between February 1, 2026 and June 30, 2026.

The Court referred to the amendment introduced via the Finance Act, 2025, which inserted a proviso to Section 112(8)of the CGST Act, mandating that in cases where the dispute relates to penalty alone and not tax, the appellant must deposit 10% of the penalty amount before filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.

The Court rejected the petitioner’s request to allow adjustment of amounts earlier paid as tax (during investigation) against this 10% penalty pre-deposit requirement.

However, the Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing that if the company deposits 10% of the penalty within eight (8) weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against it until the GST Appellate Tribunal decides the appeal.

Case Details

Case Title: Annai Infra Developers Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs and Central Tax

Case No.: Writ Petition No: 32612 Of 2025

Date:  29/10/2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Durairaj Representing

Counsel For Respondent: Dominic Fernandes

Read More: Challenge GST Penalty Order Before GSTAT: Telangana High Court 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Without Addressing Taxpayer’s Grounds: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has set aside an appellate order concerning cancellation of GST...

More like this

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...