Ask Jurishour AI

HomeGSTChallenge GST Penalty Order Before GSTAT: Telangana High Court 

Challenge GST Penalty Order Before GSTAT: Telangana High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Telangana High Court has disposed of a writ petition filed by S. Ashok Kumar, Managing Director of M/s Annai Infra Developers Ltd., Tamil Nadu, challenging a penalty order under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) laws, and directed the petitioner to instead approach the newly constituted GST Appellate Tribunal within the prescribed time window. 

The bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G.M. Mohiuddin has observed that  the GST Appellate Tribunal has begun functioning, and under Section 112 of the CGST Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2025, appeals relating to penalty-only matters require a mandatory pre-deposit of 10% of the penalty amount.

The petitioner had approached the High Court questioning the Order-in-Appeal dated 30.09.2025, by which the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the penalty imposed through the original adjudication order. 

The Tribunal has already issued a notification dated 24.09.2025 prescribing the time window for filing appeals depending on when the order was passed.
Since the order in this case is dated 30.09.2025, the petitioner may file the appeal between February 1, 2026 and June 30, 2026. 

The Court clarified that the petitioner must deposit 10% of the penalty within eight weeks to avail protection from coercive recovery.
S. Ashok Kumar

The Court rejected the petitioner’s request seeking adjustment of amounts earlier deposited under GST DRC-03(during investigation) toward the 10% penalty pre-deposit, noting that the earlier deposit was in relation to tax liability, whereas the current issue pertains only to penalty. 

Case Details

Case Title: S. Ashok Kumar Versus The Commissioner of Customs and Central Tax

Case No.: Writ Petition No: 32622 Of 2025

Date: 29/10/2025 

Counsel For  Petitioner: S. Durairaj Rep Sri Madanu Naresh

Counsel For Respondent: Dominic Fernandes

Read More: DGGI Arrests Accused During Pendency of Anticipatory Bail Application: Calcutta HC Calls It “Very Sad State of Affairs”

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Rs. 107 Crore GST Demand Against CEAT on Tyres Supplied With Tubes and Flaps Quashed

Tyre manufacturer CEAT Limited has secured relief in a Goods and Services Tax (GST)...

Judicial Orders Blocking TDS Override S. 201 Default: ITAT Deletes Tax Demand on LTC Payments Involving Foreign Travel

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that branches of a...

BSNL VRS Compensation Fully Exempt U/S 10(10B): ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench has held that compensation received by...

Pre-Commencement Business Expenses Deductible Once Business Is Set Up: ITAT 

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that expenses incurred during...

More like this

Rs. 107 Crore GST Demand Against CEAT on Tyres Supplied With Tubes and Flaps Quashed

Tyre manufacturer CEAT Limited has secured relief in a Goods and Services Tax (GST)...

Judicial Orders Blocking TDS Override S. 201 Default: ITAT Deletes Tax Demand on LTC Payments Involving Foreign Travel

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that branches of a...

BSNL VRS Compensation Fully Exempt U/S 10(10B): ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench has held that compensation received by...