Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTAhmedabad DGGI Cracks Down on Rs. 63 Crore Fake ITC Racket, Delhi-Based...

Ahmedabad DGGI Cracks Down on Rs. 63 Crore Fake ITC Racket, Delhi-Based Director Arrested

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Ahmedabad, has unearthed a large-scale fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) fraud amounting to over Rs. 63 crore. Bhavesh Kumar Shani, a director of a Delhi-based company has been arrested in connection with the fraudulent billing network.

According to officials, the accused was involved in issuing fake invoices without the actual supply of goods or services, thereby enabling fake ITC claims. The investigation revealed that the company generated bogus e-invoices and passed on fake tax credits to multiple entities, causing substantial loss to the exchequer.

Authorities stated that the fraudulent transactions were primarily carried out under the guise of providing services such as mobile recharge and e-top-up services. However, no real services were rendered. Instead, the accused allegedly created a network of shell firms to circulate fake invoices and inflate ITC claims.

The probe further revealed that invoices worth over ₹728 crore were generated, involving tax evasion exceeding ₹131 crore. Out of this, approximately ₹63.21 crore of fake ITC was fraudulently passed on. A significant portion of these transactions was found to be non-genuine, with no underlying business activity.

Officials noted that the accused violated provisions under Section 132(1)(b) of the CGST Act, which deals with issuing invoices without supply of goods or services. The offence is considered serious and non-bailable, carrying a potential imprisonment of up to five years if proven guilty.

The DGGI has indicated that further arrests are likely as the investigation continues to uncover additional links in the fake invoicing network. Authorities are also examining financial trails and bank transactions to identify other beneficiaries and accomplices.

Read More: Dhobi Receives Rs. 598 Crore Tax Notice Over Alleged Diamond Trade, Claims Identity Misuse

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...

Supreme Court Clarifies S. 28A Land Acquisition Limitation

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...