HomeGSTSC Seeks Details In Affidavit From UOI On Compliance With GST ITC...

SC Seeks Details In Affidavit From UOI On Compliance With GST ITC Timelines

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court directed the Union of India to submit detailed data on the level of compliance by assessees with the statutory timelines prescribed under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) law for availing Input Tax Credit (ITC).

The order came during the hearing of Bar Code India Ltd. vs. Union of India & Others (SLP (C) No. 7500/2025), which challenges a 2024 judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 16(4) read with Sections 37(3) and 39(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017.

A Bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Alok Aradhe directed the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) N. Venkataraman, representing the Union of India, to file an affidavit furnishing data on how other assessees across the country have adhered to the statutory timelines for claiming ITC.

The Court observed that the data would be crucial to assess the extent of compliance and the practical challenges faced by taxpayers in meeting the deadlines specified under Section 16(4) — a provision that has been at the center of numerous disputes regarding the cut-off date for availing input tax credit.

The Bench listed the matter for further hearing on December 2, 2025, directing that it should retain its position on the cause list, thereby treating it as a matter of continuing importance.

Section 16(4) of the CGST Act sets a time limit for availing ITC on invoices or debit notes for a financial year — generally up to November 30 of the following year or the filing date of the annual return, whichever is earlier.

Sections 37(3) and 39(9) relate to the filing and rectification of details of outward and inward supplies, respectively, linking the ITC claim timeline to the GST return process.

Case Details

Case Title: Bar Code India Ltd. vs. Union of India & Others

Case No.: SLP (C) No. 7500/2025

Date: 07-10-2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Pranay Shridhar Chitale, AOR

Counsel For Respondent:  N. Venkataraman, A.S.G.

Read More: DRI and Customs Intercept Undeclared Foreign Currency Worth Rs. 50.62 Lakh from Passenger at Ahmedabad Airport

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Rules Out Political Donations for 2026 US Elections, Calls for Less Money in Politics

OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has stated that he does not intend to...

Customs Can’t Reject Declared Value of Used Garments Without Proof of Undervaluation: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Can’t Demand Duty Without Proving SEZ Unit Diverted Duty-Free Gold & Silver: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Service Tax Payable on Franchise Royalty Actually Received: CESTAT 

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

More like this

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Rules Out Political Donations for 2026 US Elections, Calls for Less Money in Politics

OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has stated that he does not intend to...

Customs Can’t Reject Declared Value of Used Garments Without Proof of Undervaluation: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Can’t Demand Duty Without Proving SEZ Unit Diverted Duty-Free Gold & Silver: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...