Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGST55th GST Council Meet: No GST On ‘Penal Charges’ Levied By Banks...

55th GST Council Meet: No GST On ‘Penal Charges’ Levied By Banks And NBFCs From Borrowers For Non-Compliance With Loan Terms

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The 55th GST Council met under the Chairpersonship of Union Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman in Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, today. 

The 55th GST Council meet recommended that no GST is payable on ‘penal charges’ levied and collected by banks and Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFCs) from borrowers for non-compliance with loan terms.

Impact on Banks and NBFCs

Reduced Compliance Costs

Currently, financial institutions must manage GST compliance related to penal charges, including collection, reporting, and remittance of tax. A waiver would simplify the process for banks and NBFCs by reducing administrative and compliance costs, making the penalty system easier to implement.

Potential for Increased Penalties

With the removal of GST, banks and NBFCs may feel less incentivized to reduce the penalties they impose, as they no longer need to account for the tax burden in the pricing structure of penal charges. This could potentially lead to higher penalties, particularly if institutions decide to offset the loss of GST income through higher charges.

Risk of Exploitative Practices

Financial institutions could exploit the absence of tax on penal charges to introduce excessive or more frequent penalties, especially in cases where borrowers are already financially distressed. This could lead to more aggressive lending practices.

Impact on Borrowers

Lower Penalty Costs

Borrowers would benefit from a reduction in the overall cost of penal charges, as the waiver would remove the GST component (which is typically 18% in India). This may result in lower financial burdens on those who default or violate the terms of their loan agreements.

Will this Increased Non-Compliance?

While the removal of GST might make penal charges appear less punitive, it could inadvertently incentivize non-compliance or default, especially if borrowers perceive the penalties as more manageable or less impactful due to the tax exemption. This could lead to increased defaults or late payments.

Financial Discipline Impact

While reducing the cost of penalties might alleviate immediate financial stress for borrowers, it could undermine the deterrent effect of penalties. When penalties are lower or less burdensome, borrowers may be less motivated to adhere to loan terms, especially in the case of marginal borrowers.

Read More: 55th GST Council Meet: No GST On Vouchers Transactions

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...

Rs. 22.44 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case Involving Alleged Routing of Chinese Steel Pipes Through Thailand: Mumbai Court Grants Bail

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Esplanade, Mumbai, has granted bail to a businessman...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 11, 2026.GSTMANUFACTURE OR TRADING STATUS IRRELEVANT FOR...

Front-of-Pack Food Warning Labels Must Be Clear, Prominent and Scientifically Justified: Supreme Court Asks FSSAI to Clarify Proposal

The Supreme Court has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)...

DRI | 3 Years’ Custody and Slow Trial Alone Can’t Override NDPS Bail Bar in Commercial Quantity Case: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused regular bail to a 70-year-old man accused of...