31 Software Development Units Of HCL Technologies Can’t Be Treated as Separate Undertakings for S. 10A Deduction: ITAT

HomeDirect Tax31 Software Development Units Of HCL Technologies Can’t Be Treated as Separate...

31 Software Development Units Of HCL Technologies Can’t Be Treated as Separate Undertakings for S. 10A Deduction: ITAT

Direct Tax

Published on

16/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

31 Software Development Units Of HCL Technologies Can’t Be Treated as Separate Undertakings for S. 10A Deduction: ITAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that multiple software development units operated by HCL Technologies under common Software Technology Park (STPI) units licences cannot be treated as separate undertakings for the purpose of claiming deduction under Section 10A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The bench of Vikas Awasthy (Judicial…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Software Development Units

31 Software Development Units Of HCL Technologies Can’t Be Treated as Separate Undertakings for S. 10A Deduction: ITAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case

Calcined Kaolin Clay Can’t Be Classified as Chemically Defined Silicate: CESTAT

12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT

Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Misstates Limitation Period: CESTAT

More like this

No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case

Calcined Kaolin Clay Can’t Be Classified as Chemically Defined Silicate: CESTAT

12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories