HomeDirect TaxBREAKING | 291 Cases Filed By Income Tax Dept. Where Tax Effect...

BREAKING | 291 Cases Filed By Income Tax Dept. Where Tax Effect Is Less Than 5 Crores Listed Before Supreme Court Today

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Today, 291 cases were filed by the income tax dept. where the tax effect is less than 5 crores are listed before the Supreme Court for the final disposal.

The three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud along with Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra will preside over the cases relating to direct tax where tax effect is less than 5 Crores.

tax effect is less than 5 crores

Meaning of ‘Tax Effect’

The term ‘tax effect’ means the difference between the tax on the total income assessed and the tax that would have been chargeable had such total income been reduced by the amount of income in respect of the issues against which appeal is intended to be filed.

Read More: Income Tax Addition Can’t Be Made On Mere Admission Of Assessee Without Any Corroborative Evidence: Rajasthan High Court

Low Tax Effect: Monetary Limits Set For Filing Appeals 

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified the enhancement of Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), High Courts and Special Leave Petitions (SLPs)/appeals before the Supreme Court.

Now, the CBDT has increased the monetary limit of ITAT from Rs. 50 lakhs to Rs 60 Lakhs; high court from Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 2 crores and in case of Supreme Court the monetary limit has been enhanced from Rs. 2 Crores to Rs. 5 Crores.

Now, the CBDT has increased the monetary limit of ITAT from Rs. 50 lakhs to Rs 60 Lakhs; high court from Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 2 crores and in case of Supreme Court the monetary limit has been enhanced from Rs. 2 Crores to Rs. 2 Crores.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITAT Rectification Power U/s 254(2) Can’t Be Used To Re-Argue Merits: Allahabad HC 

The Allahabad High Court has held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s power under...

Delayed Payment Charges On Stock Broking Advances Are Interest, Not Taxable Service: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Mixed Iron Ore Consignments To Be Treated As Iron Ore Fines: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the blocking of Input Tax...

More like this

ITAT Rectification Power U/s 254(2) Can’t Be Used To Re-Argue Merits: Allahabad HC 

The Allahabad High Court has held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s power under...

Delayed Payment Charges On Stock Broking Advances Are Interest, Not Taxable Service: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Mixed Iron Ore Consignments To Be Treated As Iron Ore Fines: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...