HomeDirect TaxITAT Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Against Hyundai For Being Time Barred

ITAT Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Against Hyundai For Being Time Barred

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, quashed the income tax reassessment against Hyundai for being time barred.

The bench noted that the notice u/s 148 was issued to assessee on 15.04.2021 after enactment of the Finance Act, 2021 wherein the section 148 has undergone drastic change specifically in respect of limitation, quantum of escapement, approval and procedure.

The tribunal observed that the Substituted Section 149 is the provision governing the time-limit for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the IT Act. The substituted Section 149 of the IT Act has reduced the permissible time-limit for issuance of such a notice to three years and only in exceptional cases ten years. It also provides further additional safeguards which were absent under the earlier regime pre-Finance Act, 2021.

The bench held that the notice u/s 148 dated 15.04.2021 to re-open the assessment for AY 2015-16 is barred by limitation u/s 149(1)(b) of the Substituted Act of 2021 i.e; Finance Act, 2021. 

The bench set aside all the consequential reassessment proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice u/s 148.

It was found by the tribunal that the AO had no sanction or approval for issuance of notice u/s 148 as per newly substituted Finance Act, 2021. 

Facts 

The captioned appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of the Assessing Officer framing assessment for Assessment Year 2015-16 u/s.143(3) r.w.s.147 r.w.s.144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by order dated 12.12.2023 pursuant to the Dispute Resolution Panel-2 , Bengaluru, direction u/s 144C(5).

Hyundai Transys INC submitted that the assessment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, International Tax, Corporate Circle under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 r.w.s 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is bad in law and is contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case. 

Case Information

Case Name: Hyundai Transys INC v/s The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Citation: ITA No.338/Chny/2024

Jurisdiction: ITAT Chennai

Judges: Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am And Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm 

Download Judgment / Order

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Manufacturing Activity, Reimbursable Expenses and Out-of-Limitation Appropriation

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

Small-Service Provider Exemption Can’t Be Denied Without Evidence of Preceding-Year Turnover: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has set aside...

S. 43CA Can’t Apply to Land Sale Transactions Substantially Completed Before Provision Came Into Force: ITAT 

The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed an appeal...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 11 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 11, 2026.GSTGST APPEAL CAN’T BE TREATED...

More like this

CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Manufacturing Activity, Reimbursable Expenses and Out-of-Limitation Appropriation

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

Small-Service Provider Exemption Can’t Be Denied Without Evidence of Preceding-Year Turnover: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has set aside...

S. 43CA Can’t Apply to Land Sale Transactions Substantially Completed Before Provision Came Into Force: ITAT 

The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed an appeal...