Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxBombay High Court Quashes ITAT Order in Skyway Case Over Missing DIN;...

Bombay High Court Quashes ITAT Order in Skyway Case Over Missing DIN; Directs Fresh Hearing

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has set aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) common order in a batch of 16 appeals filed by Skyway Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. The Court held that crucial legal issues—particularly the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN) on the assessment order—had not been adequately addressed by the Tribunal.

The core of the matter revolved around assessment orders issued under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which did not bear a DIN—a mandatory requirement under CBDT Circular No. 19 of 2019. The assessee argued that this omission rendered the orders invalid and that the Tribunal failed to deal with this issue despite specific submissions and evidence, including portal screenshots.

The High Court noted that the DIN issue “goes to the root of the matter” and must be duly considered. The Bench, comprising Justices B. P. Colabawalla and Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, emphasized that since the Tribunal is the final fact-finding authority, all grounds and supporting materials must be re-examined in a fresh hearing.

Prior to reaching the High Court, the assessee had filed a Miscellaneous Application before the ITAT, which was rejected. Subsequent writ petitions were also dismissed by the High Court, albeit with liberty granted to file appeals—resulting in the present proceedings.

Apart from the DIN issue, the appeals also dealt with the time-barred nature of the assessment, alleged bogus purchases, and additions under Section 68 for unexplained loans. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on these issues but instructed the Tribunal to evaluate them afresh.

The ITAT has now been directed to rehear the matter, permitting both parties to submit additional evidence and arguments.

The Court also disposed of all interim applications as infructuous and made no order on costs.

Case Details

Case Title: Skyway Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. Versus Dy. / Asst. Commissioner of Income

Case No.: Income Tax Appeal No. 776 Of 2025

Date:  July 25, 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner:  J. D. Mistri, Senior Advocate

Counsel For Respondent: Swapna Gokhale

Read More: Modern HIV Diagnostic Kits Eligible For Customs Duty Exemption and Concessional 5% IGST: CESTAT

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

GST Demand Can’t Exceed Amount Proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court Quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore Order

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order confirming a demand...

Indemnity Clause Can’t Shield Accused From Prosecution Over Alleged Bogus GST Invoices and E-Way Bills: Himachal Pradesh High Court

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has refused to quash an FIR arising from alleged...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 2 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 2, 2026.GSTCAN TOLL-COLLECTION RIGHTS BE TREATED...

Calcutta High Court Orders Bank Account Defreezing on 10% Deposit; Examines Validity of GST Limitation Extension for FY 2018-19

The Calcutta High Court has granted interim protection against coercive recovery in a Goods...

More like this

GST Demand Can’t Exceed Amount Proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court Quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore Order

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order confirming a demand...

Indemnity Clause Can’t Shield Accused From Prosecution Over Alleged Bogus GST Invoices and E-Way Bills: Himachal Pradesh High Court

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has refused to quash an FIR arising from alleged...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 2 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 2, 2026.GSTCAN TOLL-COLLECTION RIGHTS BE TREATED...