HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Dept. Illegally Adjusted of Refunds Despite Stay on Demand: Karnataka...

Income Tax Dept. Illegally Adjusted of Refunds Despite Stay on Demand: Karnataka HC Orders Refund 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has held that the Income Tax Department acted illegally by adjusting refunds due to the company for Assessment Years (AY) 2021-22 and 2022-23 against a disputed tax demand for AY 2018-19, despite an existing stay on the recovery of 85% of that demand.  The bench of Justice S.R.Krishna Kumar quashed the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

CESTAT Quashes ₹2.31 Crore Service Tax Demand on Legal Services

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

ICAI Releases Revised Handbook on Finalisation of Accounts with GST Perspective [DOWNLOAD NOW]

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has released the revised edition of...

Supreme Court Resolves Reassessment Jurisdiction Dispute: Clarifies Role of Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers Under Income Tax Law

The Supreme Court has settled the long-standing controversy over whether reassessment notices and orders...

More like this

R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

CESTAT Quashes ₹2.31 Crore Service Tax Demand on Legal Services

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

ICAI Releases Revised Handbook on Finalisation of Accounts with GST Perspective [DOWNLOAD NOW]

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has released the revised edition of...