Gift From Brother-in-Law is Exempted U/s 56 Of Income Tax Act: ITAT

HomeDirect TaxGift From Brother-in-Law is Exempted U/s 56 Of Income Tax Act: ITAT

Gift From Brother-in-Law is Exempted U/s 56 Of Income Tax Act: ITAT

Direct Tax Top Stories

Published on

08/11/2025

By Amit Sharma

Gift From Brother-in-Law is Exempted U/s 56 Of Income Tax Act: ITAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a gift received by an individual from his brother-in-law qualifies as a transfer from a “relative” under Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and is therefore not taxable as “income from other sources.” The Bench of George Mathan (Judicial Member) and…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Amit Sharma

Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Gift From Brother-in-Law is Exempted U/s 56 Of Income Tax Act: ITAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

Appellate Authority Must Decide Whether AO Exceeded Limited Scrutiny Scope Without Converting Case Into Full Scrutiny: ITAT

Supreme Court Upholds Landowners’ Right To Additional Amenity TDR, Rejects BMC’s Waiver And Delay Objections

Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan Refugee in UAPA Case, Says Conviction Based on “Mistaken Identity” and Unreliable Witness Testimony

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Misdeclaration of Power Generation Capacity

More like this

Appellate Authority Must Decide Whether AO Exceeded Limited Scrutiny Scope Without Converting Case Into Full Scrutiny: ITAT

Supreme Court Upholds Landowners’ Right To Additional Amenity TDR, Rejects BMC’s Waiver And Delay Objections

Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan Refugee in UAPA Case, Says Conviction Based on “Mistaken Identity” and Unreliable Witness Testimony

About us

Company

Categories