Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxFinance Bill 2025: Government Amends Definition of 'Capital Asset'

Finance Bill 2025: Government Amends Definition of ‘Capital Asset’

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Finance Bill 2025 has introduced a significant amendment to the definition of “capital asset” under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This amendment brings securities held by investment funds under the capital asset category, specifically targeting Category I and Category II Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) regulated under the SEBI (AIF) Regulations, 2012.

This amendment aims to streamline the taxation framework for AIFs, ensuring clarity in the tax treatment of securities held by these funds. By recognizing such securities as capital assets, the government seeks to provide uniformity in taxation and enhance transparency in investment structures.

Government Amendment Further Expands Scope

A subsequent Government Amendment to the Finance Bill 2025 has further broadened the definition of “capital asset.” The latest revision now includes securities held by Category I or Category II AIFs where investments have been made in compliance with either the SEBI regulations or the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) regulations. This expansion aims to provide greater flexibility to AIFs operating within India and offshore financial centers, thereby aligning tax provisions with the evolving regulatory landscape.

Read More: Government Expands Tax Exemptions for Non-Residents in IFSC under Section 10(4E) of Income Tax Act

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 10 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 10, 2026.GSTGST APPEAL DEADLINE DOESN’T START...

Rs. 1 Crore Tax Refund Denied: Firm’s Payment Of Partner’s Dues Held Voluntary, Change In Constitution Not Disclosed: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a partnership firm’s plea for refund of ₹1...

₹65.52 Lakh Tax Deduction Can’t Be Denied Merely For Wrong Income Column In Return: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has held that a co-operative society’s deduction...

Income Tax Appeal Dismissed Without Merits Decision Restored Despite Repeated Non-Compliance: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has restored an income...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 10 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 10, 2026.GSTGST APPEAL DEADLINE DOESN’T START...

Rs. 1 Crore Tax Refund Denied: Firm’s Payment Of Partner’s Dues Held Voluntary, Change In Constitution Not Disclosed: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a partnership firm’s plea for refund of ₹1...

₹65.52 Lakh Tax Deduction Can’t Be Denied Merely For Wrong Income Column In Return: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has held that a co-operative society’s deduction...