HomeDirect TaxFinance Bill 2025: Government Amends Definition of 'Capital Asset'

Finance Bill 2025: Government Amends Definition of ‘Capital Asset’

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Finance Bill 2025 has introduced a significant amendment to the definition of “capital asset” under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This amendment brings securities held by investment funds under the capital asset category, specifically targeting Category I and Category II Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) regulated under the SEBI (AIF) Regulations, 2012.

This amendment aims to streamline the taxation framework for AIFs, ensuring clarity in the tax treatment of securities held by these funds. By recognizing such securities as capital assets, the government seeks to provide uniformity in taxation and enhance transparency in investment structures.

Government Amendment Further Expands Scope

A subsequent Government Amendment to the Finance Bill 2025 has further broadened the definition of “capital asset.” The latest revision now includes securities held by Category I or Category II AIFs where investments have been made in compliance with either the SEBI regulations or the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) regulations. This expansion aims to provide greater flexibility to AIFs operating within India and offshore financial centers, thereby aligning tax provisions with the evolving regulatory landscape.

Read More: Government Expands Tax Exemptions for Non-Residents in IFSC under Section 10(4E) of Income Tax Act

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Delivery of Research Reports Abroad Constitutes ‘Part Performance’, Qualifies as Export: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench has held that...

Customs Valuation: CESTAT Quashes Export Value Enhancement for Violation of Natural Justice, Remands Matter

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

SEZ Units Entitled to Service Tax Refund on Input Services Used in Authorised Operations: CESTAT Chennai Allows Nokia India’s Appeal

While reaffirming the scope of refund benefits available to Special Economic Zone (SEZ) units,...

Customs Penalty Unsustainable Without Evidence of Abetment: CESTAT Quashes Penalties U/s 112(a)

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Delivery of Research Reports Abroad Constitutes ‘Part Performance’, Qualifies as Export: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench has held that...

Customs Valuation: CESTAT Quashes Export Value Enhancement for Violation of Natural Justice, Remands Matter

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

SEZ Units Entitled to Service Tax Refund on Input Services Used in Authorised Operations: CESTAT Chennai Allows Nokia India’s Appeal

While reaffirming the scope of refund benefits available to Special Economic Zone (SEZ) units,...