Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxDRP Timeline Can’t Override Statutory Limitation: ITAT

DRP Timeline Can’t Override Statutory Limitation: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The ITAT Hyderabad has held that Disputes Resolution Panel (DRP) timeline can’t override statutory limitation. The bench of Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President) and Madhusudan Sawdia (Accountant Member) has observed that the final assessment order dated 18.10.2024 was time-barred, since in a TPO-reference case the outer limitation under Section 153(1) r/w 153(4) expired on 31.12.2023….

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Jewellery Sale Proceeds Not Exempt From Bankruptcy Estate; ₹19.17 Lakh Must Be Returned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that...

Income Tax Demand Can Be Stayed Without 20% Deposit Where Reopening Faces Limitation Challenge: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has granted an unconditional stay on an income tax demand...

Multiple GST Proceedings Over Same Suppliers: Calcutta HC Directs Dept. To Share Findings For Adjudication

The Calcutta High Court has directed coordination between investigating GST authorities and the Directorate...

Audit Detection Alone Can’t Justify GST Fraud Penalty; Specific Suppression Must Be Proved: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thiruvananthapuram, has set aside a penalty...

More like this

Jewellery Sale Proceeds Not Exempt From Bankruptcy Estate; ₹19.17 Lakh Must Be Returned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that...

Income Tax Demand Can Be Stayed Without 20% Deposit Where Reopening Faces Limitation Challenge: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has granted an unconditional stay on an income tax demand...

Multiple GST Proceedings Over Same Suppliers: Calcutta HC Directs Dept. To Share Findings For Adjudication

The Calcutta High Court has directed coordination between investigating GST authorities and the Directorate...