HomeDirect TaxDate of Possession—Not Registration—Relevant for Capital Gains Relief: ITAT

Date of Possession—Not Registration—Relevant for Capital Gains Relief: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, has ruled in favour of the assessee by allowing exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the date of possession of a property—not the date of registration—should be considered for claiming capital gains exemption. The bench of Pawan Singh (Judicial Member) has observed…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has quashed a GST assessment order passed against a registered...

Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has set aside three orders passed by the Policy Relaxation...

Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed a criminal complaint and summoning order...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses To Quash Drugs Act Complaint Against Hand Sanitizer Manufacturer Over “Not of Standard Quality” Allegations

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings initiated against...

More like this

No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has quashed a GST assessment order passed against a registered...

Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has set aside three orders passed by the Policy Relaxation...

Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed a criminal complaint and summoning order...