Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxBlack Money Act Triggers When AO Notices the Transaction — Not When...

Black Money Act Triggers When AO Notices the Transaction — Not When Undertaken: ITAT Deletes Foreign Asset Addition

Direct Tax

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Black Money Act Triggers When AO Notices the Transaction — Not When Undertaken: ITAT Deletes Foreign Asset Addition

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a landmark interpretation of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) Act, 2015, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune Bench has ruled that the Black Money Act is triggered only in the year in which the Assessing Officer (AO) first notices the foreign asset, and not in the year when the transaction…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Demand Sent to Bank Before Cut-Off Date Qualifies as “Quantified” Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held a written recovery notice stating a service tax...
GST

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Goods Left India After Refund Period: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh Bench has upheld an exporter’s...
GST

Appellate Order Can’t Simply Confirm Tax Demand Without Examining Taxpayer’s Objections, Giving Reasons: GSTAT

The Raipur Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has sent...
GST

Cash Refund Of Accumulated ITC Can Be Recovered As Erroneous Refund U/s 73 Of GST Act: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), has held that a cash refund...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Demand Sent to Bank Before Cut-Off Date Qualifies as “Quantified” Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held a written recovery notice stating a service tax...
GST

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Goods Left India After Refund Period: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh Bench has upheld an exporter’s...
GST

Appellate Order Can’t Simply Confirm Tax Demand Without Examining Taxpayer’s Objections, Giving Reasons: GSTAT

The Raipur Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has sent...