Black Money Act Triggers When AO Notices the Transaction — Not When Undertaken: ITAT Deletes Foreign Asset Addition

HomeDirect TaxBlack Money Act Triggers When AO Notices the Transaction — Not When...

Black Money Act Triggers When AO Notices the Transaction — Not When Undertaken: ITAT Deletes Foreign Asset Addition

Direct Tax Top Stories

Published on

08/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Black Money Act Triggers When AO Notices the Transaction — Not When Undertaken: ITAT Deletes Foreign Asset Addition

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a landmark interpretation of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) Act, 2015, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune Bench has ruled that the Black Money Act is triggered only in the year in which the Assessing Officer (AO) first notices the foreign asset, and not in the year when the transaction…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Black Money Act

Black Money Act Triggers When AO Notices the Transaction — Not When Undertaken: ITAT Deletes Foreign Asset Addition

Membership Required

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

About us

Company

Categories