The Supreme Court of India has held that an amalgamated company cannot claim set-off of accumulated losses incurred by the amalgamating company under the provisions of the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991. The bench of Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Vijay Bishnoi has observed that Section 12 of the Act permits carry-forward and set-off…
HomeDirect TaxAmalgamated Company Can’t Claim Set-Off of Predecessor’s Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income...
Amalgamated Company Can’t Claim Set-Off of Predecessor’s Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act: Supreme Court
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.
Latest articles
Other Laws
Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor
The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...
Other Laws
Commercial Court Can’t Rewrite Arbitral Findings: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot substantially modify arbitral awards under the...
Other Laws
Supreme Court Saves Navi Mumbai Mall From Demolition, Orders K. Raheja to Pay Rs. 318.31 Crore for Regularisation
The Supreme Court has set aside a Bombay High Court direction that would have...
Other Laws
Centre Must Apply Mind Before Refusing VRS: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of IPS Officer’s Voluntary Retirement
The Supreme Court has held that while the Central Government has the final authority...
More like this
Other Laws
Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor
The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...
Other Laws
Commercial Court Can’t Rewrite Arbitral Findings: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot substantially modify arbitral awards under the...
Other Laws
Supreme Court Saves Navi Mumbai Mall From Demolition, Orders K. Raheja to Pay Rs. 318.31 Crore for Regularisation
The Supreme Court has set aside a Bombay High Court direction that would have...

