HomeCompany & PMLASC Declines to Quash ECIR Against Jacqueline Fernandez in Rs. 200 Crore...

SC Declines to Quash ECIR Against Jacqueline Fernandez in Rs. 200 Crore Money Laundering Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court’s order dismissing Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea to quash the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered against her in connection with the ₹200-crore money laundering case linked to alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar.

A bench comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih said, “We will not interfere at this stage,”while hearing arguments from senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing on behalf of Fernandez.

The actor had moved the apex court challenging the Delhi High Court’s July 3 order that rejected her petition for quashing the ECIR, which is the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) equivalent of an FIR under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The petition was filed through advocate Sumeer Sodhi, contending that Fernandez had been falsely implicated and that continuation of proceedings against her amounted to abuse of process of law.

The case stems from allegations that Fernandez received expensive gifts and financial benefits from Chandrasekhar, who is accused of cheating several high-profile individuals and siphoning off funds worth over ₹200 crore. The Enforcement Directorate has already attached assets belonging to Fernandez as part of its probe.

With the Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene, the proceedings before the trial court and ED are set to continue.

Case Details

Case Title: Jacqueline Fernandez v. Directorate of Enforcement

Citation: SLP (CRL.) NO. 14759/2025

Read More: PMT-03 Not Always Mandatory: Delhi HC Clears Air On GST Refund Re-Credit

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Poultry Cage Weld Mesh

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Commission Retained on Air Tickets Bought Through GSA/IATA Agents Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Duty-Paid Inputs from Area-Based Exempt Units: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Ignoring Taxpayer’s Reply While Rejecting GST Refund Is Illegal: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has set aside an ex-parte order rejecting a GST refund...

More like this

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Poultry Cage Weld Mesh

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Commission Retained on Air Tickets Bought Through GSA/IATA Agents Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Duty-Paid Inputs from Area-Based Exempt Units: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...