Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLARs. 12.8 Crore Frozen : ED Raids 20 Locations in Karnataka, Haryana...

Rs. 12.8 Crore Frozen : ED Raids 20 Locations in Karnataka, Haryana in Illegal Iron Ore Export Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) on Thursday carried out extensive search operations across 20 locations in Bengaluru, Hospet, and Gurugram (Haryana) in connection with a massive illegal iron ore export racket linked to the Belekeri Port in Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka.

According to the agency, the searches were part of an ongoing probe into the unlawful export of nearly 50,000 tonnes of iron ore and the subsequent laundering of proceeds derived from these illegal activities.

During the operations, the ED seized ₹42 lakh in cash, a large number of incriminating documents, and froze assets worth ₹12.8 crore, which it identified as the proceeds of crime. The agency also recovered property-related documents showing that immovable assets were acquired using illicit funds generated from the illegal exports.

Investigation Origin and Findings

The investigation stems from multiple FIRs and chargesheets filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), following directions issued by the Supreme Court of India in earlier cases concerning illegal mining and export of iron ore from Karnataka.

According to the ED’s statement, the probe uncovered a well-organised network of excavators, traders, transporters, and exporters who allegedly colluded to siphon off iron ore without paying royalties and statutory taxes due to the state government.

“The illegally extracted iron ore was routed through a chain of intermediaries and ultimately exported for the benefit of various export companies,” the agency said. “In several cases, the ore was shown to have been procured from dummy or fictitious entities, forming a complex web of transactions to disguise the illicit origins of the goods and funds.”

The exporters, the ED noted, had failed to furnish complete documentation for the iron ore shipments, while profits earned from these illegal exports were laundered and presented as legitimate business income.

Key Entities Under the Scanner

The agency identified several companies and individuals who allegedly benefited from the illegal operations. These include:

  • MSPL Ltd — led by Narendra Kumar Baldota
  • Greentex Mining Industries Ltd — headed by Ajay Kharwanda
  • Srinivasa Minerals Trading Co — owned by Y. Srinivas Rao
  • Arshad Exports — managed by Mohammad Asghar Khan
  • SVM Nett Project Solutions Pvt Ltd — operated by Basavaraj B
  • Alphine Minmetals India Pvt Ltd — associated with Gagan Shukla

All these entities, according to the ED, were among the major beneficiaries of the illegal iron ore exports and used the proceeds to acquire properties and assets, projecting them as legitimate earnings from lawful business activities.

Read More: ED’s Selective Approach in Liquor Scam Probe Not Illegal But Procedurally Irregular: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses Plea Challenging Arrest

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...

Supreme Court Clarifies S. 28A Land Acquisition Limitation

The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 21 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 21, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HC’S REFUSAL...

Serious Investigative Lapses: Supreme Court Orders De Novo Probe Into 2012 Rape-Murder of 17-Year-Old

The Supreme Court has ordered a de novo investigation into the 2012 rape and...

Conflict Between Trade Marks Act S. 134 and Commercial Courts Act on Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench

The Supreme Court has referred to a Larger Bench an important question concerning the...