HomeCompany & PMLAED Official Vishal Deep Says That His Arrest Was A Consequence Of ...

ED Official Vishal Deep Says That His Arrest Was A Consequence Of  Enquiry Into Illegal Acts Committed By CBI Officials

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) Official, Vishal Deep filed the anticipatory bail application before the  Chandigarh CBI Court in which it was stated that this was a consequence of his discreet enquiry into illegal acts committed by senior CBI Officials.

The CBI claimed Deep demanded Rs. 1.10 crore bribe from Himalayan group of professional institutions chairman Rajnish Bansal for not arresting him in a money laundering case being probed by the ED. The amount was negotiated down to Rs. 60 lakh, the probe agency said. 

There is a recording of accused Deep talking to the complainant before the delivery of the bribe amount and he was present near the spot where the bribe was handed over to co-accused Vikas Deep and Niraj by the complainant, the CBI claimed. 

The application is set for hearing on January 14, where Special CBI Court Judge Alka Malik has directed the CBI to submit its reply.

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Hearing Given, Non-Speaking Order Invalid: Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Demand, Orders Fresh Adjudication

The Bombay High Court has set aside a customs adjudication order passed without granting...

SC Upholds S. 74 Penalty: Curative Petition Dismissed, Non-Filing & Tax Non-Payment Treated as Suppression of Facts

The Supreme Court has dismissed a curative petition filed by a taxpayer against an...

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has held that a...

More like this

No Hearing Given, Non-Speaking Order Invalid: Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Demand, Orders Fresh Adjudication

The Bombay High Court has set aside a customs adjudication order passed without granting...

SC Upholds S. 74 Penalty: Curative Petition Dismissed, Non-Filing & Tax Non-Payment Treated as Suppression of Facts

The Supreme Court has dismissed a curative petition filed by a taxpayer against an...

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...