Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLACourt Rejects CBI’s Transit Remand Application Against ED Official Involved In Bribery...

Court Rejects CBI’s Transit Remand Application Against ED Official Involved In Bribery Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A special court in Mumbai rejected the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) remand application of Enforcement Directorate (ED) Assistant Director Vishal Deep, who was arrested in connection with the bribery case. 

The court ordered his release upon furnishing a personal recognisance bond of Rs 50,000.

The CBI arrested Deep on January 8 from Andheri West, alleging his involvement in bribery cases linked to two First Information Reports (FIRs). One FIR, registered in Chandigarh on December 22, accused Deep of accepting bribes from an individual implicated in the Himachal Pradesh Scholarship Scam.

The CBI claimed Deep demanded Rs. 1.10 crore bribe from Himalayan group of professional institutions chairman Rajnish Bansal for not arresting him in a money laundering case being probed by the ED. The amount was negotiated down to Rs. 60 lakh, the probe agency said. There is a recording of accused Deep talking to the complainant before the delivery of the bribe amount and he was present near the spot where the bribe was handed over to co-accused Vikas Deep and Niraj by the complainant, the CBI claimed. 

Court Rejects CBI’s Transit Remand Application Against ED Official Involved In Bribery Case
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Failure To Claim Exemption In Returns Cannot Defeat Service Tax Refund: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has directed the department...

Financial Assistance For Metro Publicity At Diwali Attracts Service Tax: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Political Donation Deduction Can’t Be Denied For Missing Party Confirmation: CIT(A)

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), through the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), has...

DRI | Goods Not Reaching Declared Destination Alone Can’t Defeat Export Benefit: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

More like this

Failure To Claim Exemption In Returns Cannot Defeat Service Tax Refund: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has directed the department...

Financial Assistance For Metro Publicity At Diwali Attracts Service Tax: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Political Donation Deduction Can’t Be Denied For Missing Party Confirmation: CIT(A)

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), through the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), has...