Ask Jurishour AI

HomeColumnsWhether Separate Notification For Cross-Empowerment Of State Officials Under GST Act Is...

Whether Separate Notification For Cross-Empowerment Of State Officials Under GST Act Is Required ? These Two High Court Differs

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The issue raised before the Kerala High Court and Madras High Court was whether separate notification for cross-empowerment of state officials under GST Act is required?

Tvl. Vardhan Infrastructure v. Special Secretary, Head of the GST Council Secretariat: Madras High Court

Both the Madras High Court and Kerala High Court have different opinions.

The Madras High Court in Tvl. Vardhan Infrastructure v. Special Secretary, Head of the GST Council Secretariat, which takes the view that, without there being a notification as contemplated by the provisions of Section 6(1) of the CGST Act, there is no cross-empowerment, and the Central Authority or the State Authority to which a taxpayer is assigned must be the one to initiate proceedings under CGST/SGST Acts.

Pinnacle Vehicles And Services Private Limited Versus Joint Commissioner: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court in the case of Pinnacle Vehicles And Services Private Limited Versus Joint Commissioner held that cross-empowerment of GST officers to function as proper officers under the CGST Act is through the legislative mandate under Section 6(1) of the CGST Act. The bench of Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice Easwaran S. has observed that while the statutory mandate at present is unqualified, it will be qualified in the event the Government specifies conditions for the exercise of power under the statutory mandate, pursuant to the recommendations of the Council. 

Section 6 Of CGST Act

Section 6 of the GST Act deals with the authorisation of officers of State tax or Union territory tax as proper officers in certain circumstances.

Under Section 6 of the CGST Act, the officers appointed under the GST cannot be authorised as proper officers for the purposes of the CGST Act unless and until conditions for exercise of the powers of a proper officer are first specified by the Government on the recommendation of the GST Council through a notification issued for the purpose.

Read More: This Patna High Court Judgement Interprets Section 107(1) Of GST Act In Favour Of Assessee

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 25 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 20, 2026.GSTALLAHABAD HIGH COURT QUASHES BNS...

GSTAT Denies S. 128A Amnesty for Excess ITC Availed in December 2020 Despite Assessee’s Claim That Underlying Debit Notes Pertained to FY 2018-19

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that the...

Assessment Invalid Where AO Acted Under Directions of Superior Authority: ITAT Deletes Rs. 11.12 Crore ‘On-Money’ Addition

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed an appeal...

No Pre-Deposit Where Proceedings Began Before 01.10.2025: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has granted interim relief to a taxpayer on GST pre-deposit...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 25 AUGUST, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 20, 2026.GSTALLAHABAD HIGH COURT QUASHES BNS...

GSTAT Denies S. 128A Amnesty for Excess ITC Availed in December 2020 Despite Assessee’s Claim That Underlying Debit Notes Pertained to FY 2018-19

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that the...

Assessment Invalid Where AO Acted Under Directions of Superior Authority: ITAT Deletes Rs. 11.12 Crore ‘On-Money’ Addition

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed an appeal...