HomeColumnsRs. 15,000 Limit for OTP-Free Auto-Debits: RBI Eases E-Mandate Rules

Rs. 15,000 Limit for OTP-Free Auto-Debits: RBI Eases E-Mandate Rules

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has introduced a consolidated framework for digital payment e-mandates, aimed at simplifying recurring payment systems while strengthening customer protection across platforms such as UPI, cards, and prepaid payment instruments (PPIs), including both domestic and cross-border transactions.

Under the revised guidelines, recurring transactions of up to ₹15,000 can now be processed without the need for a one-time password (OTP). This move is expected to make routine payments such as subscriptions and utility bills more seamless. Additionally, transactions exceeding ₹15,000 and up to ₹1 lakh—covering categories like insurance premiums, mutual fund investments, and credit card bill payments—may also be executed without additional factor authentication (AFA), subject to compliance with prescribed safeguards.

To balance convenience with security, the RBI has mandated a robust alert mechanism. Customers must receive pre-debit notifications at least 24 hours before the transaction, clearly specifying key details such as the merchant’s name, transaction amount, and debit date. These alerts will also provide users with an option to opt out of the transaction if required.

Buy Now: GST E-Magazine Mega Combo (11 Publications)

Further, post-debit notifications are compulsory and must include complete transaction details along with information on grievance redressal channels. This ensures that customers remain informed at every stage and have recourse in case of disputes.

The framework emphasizes that while OTP requirements are relaxed for certain transactions, strong authentication must be completed at the time of registering the e-mandate. Customers opting for such mandates will need to undergo a one-time authentication process to authorize automatic debits from their bank accounts.

An e-mandate functions as a standing digital instruction that enables automatic recurring payments, eliminating the need for manual intervention each time a payment is due. The RBI has clarified that no additional charges will be levied for availing e-mandate facilities, and customers will retain full control over managing, modifying, or cancelling these mandates.

The central bank noted that the revised framework incorporates feedback from stakeholders and is designed to enhance user trust while promoting digital payments. By combining ease of use with layered security measures, the RBI aims to create a more efficient and secure ecosystem for recurring digital transactions.

Read More: Banks Seeking “Future End-Use” Certificates from CAs Raise Professional Concerns

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has held that a...

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Statements Without S. 9D Procedure Not Admissible: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.12 Cr CENVAT Credit Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

More like this

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has held that a...

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...