Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeColumnsRs. 15,000 Limit for OTP-Free Auto-Debits: RBI Eases E-Mandate Rules

Rs. 15,000 Limit for OTP-Free Auto-Debits: RBI Eases E-Mandate Rules

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has introduced a consolidated framework for digital payment e-mandates, aimed at simplifying recurring payment systems while strengthening customer protection across platforms such as UPI, cards, and prepaid payment instruments (PPIs), including both domestic and cross-border transactions.

Under the revised guidelines, recurring transactions of up to ₹15,000 can now be processed without the need for a one-time password (OTP). This move is expected to make routine payments such as subscriptions and utility bills more seamless. Additionally, transactions exceeding ₹15,000 and up to ₹1 lakh—covering categories like insurance premiums, mutual fund investments, and credit card bill payments—may also be executed without additional factor authentication (AFA), subject to compliance with prescribed safeguards.

To balance convenience with security, the RBI has mandated a robust alert mechanism. Customers must receive pre-debit notifications at least 24 hours before the transaction, clearly specifying key details such as the merchant’s name, transaction amount, and debit date. These alerts will also provide users with an option to opt out of the transaction if required.

Buy Now: GST E-Magazine Mega Combo (11 Publications)

Further, post-debit notifications are compulsory and must include complete transaction details along with information on grievance redressal channels. This ensures that customers remain informed at every stage and have recourse in case of disputes.

The framework emphasizes that while OTP requirements are relaxed for certain transactions, strong authentication must be completed at the time of registering the e-mandate. Customers opting for such mandates will need to undergo a one-time authentication process to authorize automatic debits from their bank accounts.

An e-mandate functions as a standing digital instruction that enables automatic recurring payments, eliminating the need for manual intervention each time a payment is due. The RBI has clarified that no additional charges will be levied for availing e-mandate facilities, and customers will retain full control over managing, modifying, or cancelling these mandates.

The central bank noted that the revised framework incorporates feedback from stakeholders and is designed to enhance user trust while promoting digital payments. By combining ease of use with layered security measures, the RBI aims to create a more efficient and secure ecosystem for recurring digital transactions.

Read More: Banks Seeking “Future End-Use” Certificates from CAs Raise Professional Concerns

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrongful ITC Availment: GSTAT Quashes Demand Beyond SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...

GST Appeal Filed Within 3 Months After Excluding Order Date Can’t Be Rejected as Delayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected solely on...

Jurisdictional Officer Can’t Issue Reassessment Notice Where NFAC Has Exclusive Authority: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has disposed of a taxpayer’s challenge to reassessment...

GST Summons Alone Can’t Justify Anticipatory Bail Without S. 69 Arrest Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that the mere issuance of summons...

More like this

GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrongful ITC Availment: GSTAT Quashes Demand Beyond SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...

GST Appeal Filed Within 3 Months After Excluding Order Date Can’t Be Rejected as Delayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected solely on...

Jurisdictional Officer Can’t Issue Reassessment Notice Where NFAC Has Exclusive Authority: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has disposed of a taxpayer’s challenge to reassessment...