HomeColumnsNational Commission for Men Demand Rekindled After Ketan Agarwal Murder Case: Should...

National Commission for Men Demand Rekindled After Ketan Agarwal Murder Case: Should India Create a Statutory Body for Men’s Rights?

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The demand for establishing a National Commission for Men (NCM) has once again entered the national spotlight following the alleged murder of Pune-based businessman Ketan Agarwal, a case that has sparked widespread debate over whether India requires a statutory institution dedicated to addressing issues affecting men.

The renewed demand was made by Ashok Kumar Mittal, a Rajya Sabha MP, who cited the Ketan Agarwal case as evidence that “men, too, can be victims” and deserve institutional support and legal protection. Mittal reiterated his appeal by sharing a video of his speech in Parliament from December 2025, when he introduced the National Commission for Men Bill, 2025, a Private Member’s Bill currently pending before the Rajya Sabha.

Buy Now: June 2026 Ultimate Legal & Taxation Combo

A Case That Reignited the Debate

The demand comes amid the ongoing investigation into the alleged murder of Ketan Agarwal (26), a Pune-based realtor who allegedly lost his life after being pushed off a cliff at Lohagad Fort. His fiancée Siya Goyal (20) and her alleged associate Chetan Chaudhary (22) have been arrested in connection with the case.

On July 3, a Pune court remanded both accused to 14 days of judicial custody until July 16, while rejecting the police’s request for extended custody. The court also declined a request for polygraph examinations after both accused refused to undergo lie-detector tests.

While the criminal investigation continues and the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court, the case has triggered a wider public conversation on gender-neutral justice and institutional mechanisms available to male victims.

What Ashok Kumar Mittal Said

Sharing his views on social media, Mittal wrote:

“The Ketan case is a reminder that men, too, can be victims. They deserve institutional support, legal protection, and a platform where their voices are heard. Justice must be equal for everyone, irrespective of gender.”

He also stated that every victim deserves equal protection under the law and called for a fair and impartial investigation into the Ketan Agarwal case.

What is the National Commission for Men Bill, 2025?

The National Commission for Men Bill, 2025 is a Private Member’s Bill introduced in the Rajya Sabha on December 5, 2025. Unlike government bills, Private Member’s Bills are introduced by Members of Parliament who are not ministers.

The proposed legislation seeks to establish a statutory National Commission for Men, broadly modeled on the existing National Commission for Women (NCW).

Among its major proposals are:

  • Protection of men’s constitutional and legal rights.
  • Investigation into grievances concerning alleged violations of men’s rights.
  • Research on issues including male suicide, mental health, unemployment, domestic abuse, health disparities and child custody disputes.
  • Public awareness campaigns promoting emotional well-being, healthy masculinity and gender sensitivity.
  • Powers similar to those of a civil court while conducting inquiries.
  • Representation from experts in law, sociology, psychology, public administration and social work.

Importantly, the Bill explicitly states that nothing in its provisions shall dilute or affect the legal protections already available to women under existing laws. It further restricts the proposed Commission from intervening in complaints filed by women unless a competent court declares such complaints to be false, malicious or an abuse of legal process.

Can the Bill Become Law?

Although the proposal has generated fresh public discussion, constitutional experts note that Private Member’s Bills rarely become law in India.

According to parliamentary records, only 14 Private Member’s Bills have ever been enacted since Independence, and none has been passed by both Houses of Parliament since 1970. Therefore, while the Bill has succeeded in initiating debate, its chances of becoming legislation without government backing remain limited.

Existing Institutional Framework

India presently has the National Commission for Women, established under the National Commission for Women Act, 1990, which became operational in 1992. The Commission reviews legal safeguards for women, recommends legislative reforms and facilitates grievance redressal.

Supporters of a National Commission for Men argue that a comparable body could address issues uniquely affecting men without undermining existing protections for women. Critics, however, maintain that gender-neutral reforms within existing institutions may be a more appropriate solution than creating separate statutory bodies.

The Road Ahead

The Ketan Agarwal case has undoubtedly revived a long-standing discussion about gender-neutral access to justice in India. Whether the National Commission for Men Bill progresses beyond the introduction stage remains uncertain, but the debate surrounding institutional support for male victims has gained renewed national attention.

For now, the Bill remains pending before Parliament, while the Ketan Agarwal murder investigation continues under judicial scrutiny.

Read More: How to Save Money on LPG Cylinder Booking: Best Apps, Cashback Offers In 2026

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

GST Proceedings Under Wrong Provision? Karnataka High Court Stays S. 74 Action Over Interest and Penalty After ITC Reversal

The Karnataka High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer challenging GST proceedings...

GST Recovery Against Genuine Buyer Before Proceeding Against Defaulting Supplier Stayed: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has granted interim relief to a taxpayer in a Goods...

DRI Withdraws Summons To Advocate; Delhi High Court Holds Summons To Advocates Only In Rare And Exceptional Circumstances

The Delhi High Court has observed that summoning an advocate under Section 108 of...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 25 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 25, 2026.GSTS. 73(2) OF CGST ACT...

More like this

GST Proceedings Under Wrong Provision? Karnataka High Court Stays S. 74 Action Over Interest and Penalty After ITC Reversal

The Karnataka High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer challenging GST proceedings...

GST Recovery Against Genuine Buyer Before Proceeding Against Defaulting Supplier Stayed: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has granted interim relief to a taxpayer in a Goods...

DRI Withdraws Summons To Advocate; Delhi High Court Holds Summons To Advocates Only In Rare And Exceptional Circumstances

The Delhi High Court has observed that summoning an advocate under Section 108 of...