Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeColumnsCompanies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Notified: MCA Revises DIR-3...

Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Notified: MCA Revises DIR-3 KYC Filing Fee Structure

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has notified the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026, introducing significant changes to the fee structure for filing Form DIR-3 KYC Web, a mandatory compliance requirement for company directors. The amendment was published in the Official Gazette on April 21, 2026, and came into immediate effect from the date of its publication. 

Key Amendment: Revised Fee Structure for DIR-3 KYC Web

The amendment substitutes Item VII of the Annexure under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, specifically addressing the fee payable for filing DIR-3 KYC Web under Rule 12A of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.

As per the revised framework:

Nil Fee for Timely Filing:

Where Form DIR-3 KYC Web is filed within the prescribed timeline, no fee will be charged. This continues to encourage timely compliance by directors. 

₹5,000 Fee for Delayed Filing or DIN Reactivation

A substantial fee of ₹5,000 will be levied if the form is filed after the due date or where filing is required for reactivation of a deactivated Director Identification Number (DIN). 

₹500 Fee for Subsequent Updates

In cases where the DIR-3 KYC Web form is filed again for updating or modifying details at any time, a fee of ₹500 per filing will be applicable. 

The Central Government has exercised its rule-making powers under multiple provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, including Sections 396, 398, 399, 403, 404, read with Section 469, to implement these amendments. 

Buy Now: How Courts look at Customs Seizure at Airports & Passenger Rights : CASE COMPILATION

Objective and Compliance Impact

The amendment aims to streamline compliance related to director KYC filings while maintaining strict penalties for delays. By retaining a zero-fee structure for timely compliance and imposing a hefty penalty for non-compliance, the MCA reinforces the importance of maintaining updated director records in the corporate registry.

The introduction of a nominal fee for voluntary updates also reflects a move towards facilitating dynamic and accurate data maintenance without imposing excessive burden.

Background

Form DIR-3 KYC is a mandatory annual compliance for individuals holding a DIN, ensuring that their personal and contact details are verified and updated in the MCA database. Failure to comply within timelines results in deactivation of DIN, impacting the individual’s ability to function as a director.

Conclusion

The Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 represent a calibrated approach by the MCA—balancing ease of compliance with deterrence against delays. Directors and companies are advised to adhere strictly to filing timelines to avoid significant financial penalties and operational disruptions.

Notification Details

Notification No. F. No. 01/16/2013-CL-V (Pt-I)

Date:  21/04/2026

Read More: Arbitration Act is a Complete Code: Legal Heirs Must Challenge Arbitral Award Under S. 34, Not Article 227: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...

S. 106 Can’t Replace Proof of Guilt: Supreme Court Acquits Man in Kidnapping-Murder Case, Calls Investigation ‘Shoddy’

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted in a kidnapping and murder case...

More like this

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...