HomeColumnsCompanies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Notified: MCA Revises DIR-3...

Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 Notified: MCA Revises DIR-3 KYC Filing Fee Structure

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has notified the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026, introducing significant changes to the fee structure for filing Form DIR-3 KYC Web, a mandatory compliance requirement for company directors. The amendment was published in the Official Gazette on April 21, 2026, and came into immediate effect from the date of its publication. 

Key Amendment: Revised Fee Structure for DIR-3 KYC Web

The amendment substitutes Item VII of the Annexure under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, specifically addressing the fee payable for filing DIR-3 KYC Web under Rule 12A of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.

As per the revised framework:

Nil Fee for Timely Filing:

Where Form DIR-3 KYC Web is filed within the prescribed timeline, no fee will be charged. This continues to encourage timely compliance by directors. 

₹5,000 Fee for Delayed Filing or DIN Reactivation

A substantial fee of ₹5,000 will be levied if the form is filed after the due date or where filing is required for reactivation of a deactivated Director Identification Number (DIN). 

₹500 Fee for Subsequent Updates

In cases where the DIR-3 KYC Web form is filed again for updating or modifying details at any time, a fee of ₹500 per filing will be applicable. 

The Central Government has exercised its rule-making powers under multiple provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, including Sections 396, 398, 399, 403, 404, read with Section 469, to implement these amendments. 

Buy Now: How Courts look at Customs Seizure at Airports & Passenger Rights : CASE COMPILATION

Objective and Compliance Impact

The amendment aims to streamline compliance related to director KYC filings while maintaining strict penalties for delays. By retaining a zero-fee structure for timely compliance and imposing a hefty penalty for non-compliance, the MCA reinforces the importance of maintaining updated director records in the corporate registry.

The introduction of a nominal fee for voluntary updates also reflects a move towards facilitating dynamic and accurate data maintenance without imposing excessive burden.

Background

Form DIR-3 KYC is a mandatory annual compliance for individuals holding a DIN, ensuring that their personal and contact details are verified and updated in the MCA database. Failure to comply within timelines results in deactivation of DIN, impacting the individual’s ability to function as a director.

Conclusion

The Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2026 represent a calibrated approach by the MCA—balancing ease of compliance with deterrence against delays. Directors and companies are advised to adhere strictly to filing timelines to avoid significant financial penalties and operational disruptions.

Notification Details

Notification No. F. No. 01/16/2013-CL-V (Pt-I)

Date:  21/04/2026

Read More: Arbitration Act is a Complete Code: Legal Heirs Must Challenge Arbitral Award Under S. 34, Not Article 227: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CESTAT Allows Use of CENVAT Credit of Basic Excise Duty for Payment of NCCD Prior to 2016

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that...

Service Tax on Cylinder Retention Charges: CESTAT Says Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Curable Defects

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that...

Demand Fails as Undervaluation Not Proven & Extended Limitation Not Invokable in Stainless Steel Coil Imports Case: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Extended Limitation Not Invocable: CESTAT Quashes Major Demands on Jet Airways While Upholding Limited Service Tax Liability

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has partly allowed...

More like this

CESTAT Allows Use of CENVAT Credit of Basic Excise Duty for Payment of NCCD Prior to 2016

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that...

Service Tax on Cylinder Retention Charges: CESTAT Says Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Curable Defects

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has held that...

Demand Fails as Undervaluation Not Proven & Extended Limitation Not Invokable in Stainless Steel Coil Imports Case: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...