HomeColumnsBuyback of Shares May Offer a Rare “Double Tax Benefit” for Certain...

Buyback of Shares May Offer a Rare “Double Tax Benefit” for Certain Middle-Class Taxpayers in AY 2026-27

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The taxation of share buybacks underwent a significant transformation from October 1, 2024. What was once a tax paid by the company under the buyback tax regime is now largely taxable in the hands of shareholders. However, the manner in which the law was drafted has created an unusual consequence for Assessment Year (AY) 2026-27, potentially resulting in a “double tax benefit” for certain individual taxpayers, particularly those falling within the rebate threshold.

This anomaly, however, is short-lived, as the Government has already moved to change the taxation framework through the Finance Act, 2026. 

Buy Now: Customs Duty Judgements E-Compilation – June 2026

The Post-October 2024 Buyback Tax Regime

The Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 fundamentally altered the taxation of buybacks undertaken by domestic companies from October 1, 2024.

Under the amended provisions:

  • The amount received by a shareholder on buyback is treated as a deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(f).
  • The shareholder is taxed on the entire buyback consideration at applicable slab rates.
  • No deduction is allowed for the cost of acquisition while computing such dividend income.
  • Simultaneously, for capital gains purposes, Section 46A deems the full value of consideration as “Nil”, resulting in the cost of acquisition becoming a capital loss. 

This creates an unusual situation where the same transaction generates taxable dividend income and a separate capital loss.

Illustration: Infosys Buyback

Consider the following example:

  • Shares tendered in buyback: 65 shares
  • Buyback proceeds received: ₹1,22,400
  • Cost of acquisition of shares: ₹1,10,000

Step 1: Taxation as Dividend

The entire buyback proceeds of ₹1,22,400 are treated as deemed dividend income under Section 2(22)(f). The shareholder cannot deduct the cost of shares while computing this income. 

For a taxpayer whose total income remains within the rebate threshold under the applicable tax regime, the tax liability on this deemed dividend may effectively become nil.

Step 2: Capital Loss Recognition

For capital gains purposes, the law treats the consideration as nil. Consequently:

Capital Loss = Cost of Acquisition – Nil

= ₹1,10,000

Thus, the shareholder acquires a capital loss of ₹1,10,000. 

Step 3: Set-Off Against Capital Gains

The capital loss can be set off against eligible capital gains in accordance with the Income-tax Act.

If the loss qualifies as a short-term capital loss and is adjusted against short-term capital gains taxable at 20%, the tax saving could be:

₹1,10,000 × 20%

= ₹22,000

Therefore:

  • Dividend income may suffer no tax because of rebate/slab benefits.
  • Capital loss may reduce future capital gains tax.

This effectively creates a dual tax advantage arising from a single buyback transaction.

Why Middle-Class Investors Benefit the Most

The anomaly is particularly beneficial for taxpayers whose overall income remains within the rebate limits.

For such investors:

  1. Buyback proceeds increase taxable income but may still remain within the rebate threshold.
  2. No actual tax may be payable on the deemed dividend.
  3. The entire acquisition cost survives as a capital loss.
  4. The capital loss can offset taxable gains from other equity or capital market transactions.

In practical terms, the investor receives the buyback proceeds while simultaneously preserving a tax asset in the form of a capital loss.

Legislative Intent and Criticism

The tax structure attracted criticism soon after its introduction.

Many tax professionals argued that taxing the gross buyback proceeds as dividend without allowing deduction for acquisition cost resulted in inequitable outcomes, particularly for minority shareholders. At the same time, the availability of capital loss created planning opportunities and tax arbitrage. 

The Government subsequently acknowledged these concerns while presenting the Union Budget 2026.

Budget 2026 Changes the Rules

Recognizing the distortions under the 2024 framework, the Finance Act, 2026 has overhauled the taxation of buybacks.

The new regime proposes that buyback receipts be taxed directly as capital gains, allowing the shareholder to deduct the cost of acquisition while computing taxable gains. This effectively removes the peculiar situation where the same transaction simultaneously generates deemed dividend income and capital loss. 

According to the Government’s explanation, the change was introduced to ensure a more rational and equitable tax treatment for shareholders and to eliminate arbitrage opportunities created by the earlier provisions. 

Conclusion

For AY 2026-27, taxpayers who participated in buybacks undertaken after October 1, 2024 may encounter one of the most unusual outcomes in recent tax law history. The entire buyback consideration is taxed as deemed dividend, yet the cost of acquisition simultaneously transforms into a capital loss.

Where the taxpayer’s income remains within the rebate threshold, the dividend income may escape tax altogether, while the capital loss can still be utilized against future capital gains. The result is a rare “double benefit” that was likely unintended and has since been addressed through the Budget 2026 amendments.

For investors filing returns for AY 2026-27, careful reporting of both the deemed dividend income and the corresponding capital loss will be crucial to ensure compliance and to legitimately avail the tax benefits available under the law as it stood during the relevant period.

Read More: Ahmedabad Customs Seizes Gold Jewellery Worth Rs. 98.79 Lakh Concealed by Woman Passenger Arriving from Abu Dhabi

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

PFMS Users Can Now Authenticate Using PAN or Bank Account Under Revised Aadhaar Rules

In a significant move aimed at improving user convenience and expanding digital access to...

After 99-Day Wait, Income Tax Dept. Releases ITR-5 Excel Utility for AY 2026-27

In a relief for taxpayers required to file ITR-5, the Income Tax Department has...

Contractor Entitled to Service Tax Exemption for Government Health Centre Projects: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Extended Limitation Not Invocable Without Proper Verification: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

PFMS Users Can Now Authenticate Using PAN or Bank Account Under Revised Aadhaar Rules

In a significant move aimed at improving user convenience and expanding digital access to...

After 99-Day Wait, Income Tax Dept. Releases ITR-5 Excel Utility for AY 2026-27

In a relief for taxpayers required to file ITR-5, the Income Tax Department has...

Contractor Entitled to Service Tax Exemption for Government Health Centre Projects: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...