HomeColumns8th Pay Commission: Some Allowances May Be Scrapped Similar to 7th CPC;...

8th Pay Commission: Some Allowances May Be Scrapped Similar to 7th CPC; Implementation Likely Delayed

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The much-anticipated 8th Central Pay Commission (CPC), which is expected to revise salaries, allowances, and pensions of central government employees, could face delays in implementation. 

Although the Union Cabinet, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, cleared the proposal to set up the commission in January this year, experts believe that its recommendations may not come into force immediately from January 1, 2026, as originally scheduled. Instead, the process might extend into late 2026 or even the first half of 2027, due to the pending finalisation of the Terms of Reference (ToR) and the appointment of the commission’s chairperson and members.

Lessons from the 7th CPC

During the 7th Pay Commission review, many allowances were either merged or abolished after it was found that they overlapped in purpose or had become redundant. While the revised pay structure took effect in January 2016, allowances such as House Rent Allowance (HRA) and Transport Allowance were notified only from July 2017—without arrears for the interim period.

Possible Allowance Cuts in the 8th CPC

Analysts suggest that the 8th CPC could follow a similar path by recommending the removal of allowances that have lost relevance or combining those with overlapping objectives. This has sparked unease among central government employees, who are concerned that some benefits may be withdrawn once the commission completes its review.

Uncertainty Looms

With no clarity yet on the ToR or the names of those who will head and constitute the commission, uncertainty continues to grow among employees. The delay has also triggered speculation that the 8th CPC’s recommendations on pay hikes and allowances may take longer than expected, creating anxiety about the future structure of employee compensation.

Read More: 15 Days Left, 3 Crore ITRs Pending: AIS-TIS, 26AS Not Working, OTP Glitches Trouble Taxpayers

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...

GST | Allahabad High Court Restores Opportunity to Reply in S. 74 Proceedings, Quashes Adjudication Order Passed Without Hearing

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order passed against an...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...