HomeCase CompilationJURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 4, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 4, 2026.

GST

  1. EXECUTIVE CIRCULAR CAN’T CURTAIL STATUTORY LIMITATION U/S 54 OF GST ACT: CALCUTTA HC QUASHES REJECTION OF ITC REFUND
  2. 40% GST ON TOBACCO HOOKAH; 18% ON NON-TOBACCO VARIANT: AAR
  3. GST EXEMPTION ALLOWED ON SEGREGATED WASTE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PROVIDED TO HOWRAH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION: AAR
  4. SECURITY SERVICES PROVIDED TO FCI ARE NOT EXEMPT FROM GST: AAR
  5. 40% GST ON NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, 5% GST ON ICED TEA PREPARATION: AAR
  6. SEMEN SORTING SERVICES EXEMPTED FROM GST: AAR
  7. NO GST ON CONSULTANCY SERVICE BY ARCHITECT TO AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION: AAR
  8. GST CAN’T BE DEDUCTED FROM RETIRAL DUES OF EMPLOYEES: ALLAHABAD HC

Service Tax

  1. AP HIGH COURT REMANDS SERVICE TAX ORDER OVER LEVY ON OCEAN FREIGHT ALREADY SUBJECTED TO CUSTOMS DUTY
  2. WHEN SERVICE TAX IS SHOWN SEPARATELY IN INVOICES, ASSESSEE CAN’T LATER CLAIM CUM-TAX BENEFIT MERELY BECAUSE TENANT FAILED TO PAY TAX: CESTAT

Customs Duty

  1. REVISIONAL ORDER QUASHED FOR TAKING CONTRADICTORY CLASSIFICATION STAND DESPITE ACCEPTANCE OF CESTAT RULING: CALCUTTA HC 
  2. IF CUSTOMS APPEAL NOTICES NOT SERVED, DEPT. TO ATTEMPT SERVICE THROUGH OTHER MODES: CALCUTTA HC
  3. DGFT’S MINIMUM IMPORT PRICE CAN’T BE ADOPTED FOR VALUATION OF EOU DTA CLEARANCES: CESTAT
  4. DEPT. FAILED TO PROVE CLANDESTINE REMOVAL IN ‘GOLD MOHAR’ PAN MASALA CASE: CESTAT QUASHES CASH AND GOODS CONFISCATION 

Income Tax

  1. DELAY BY ASSESSEE CAN’T VALIDATE AN OTHERWISE INVALID S. 148 NOTICE, WHEN RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS ARE INITIATED: BOMBAY HC
  2. SALES TAX SUBSIDY RECEIVED UNDER STATE INDUSTRIAL POLICY CONSTITUTES CAPITAL RECEIPT, NOT LIABLE TO INCOME TAX: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
  3. SAME BANK DEPOSITS CAN’T BE SUBJECTED TO REASSESSMENT TWICE: ORISSA HC
  4. NO PE FOR ORACLE SYSTEMS IN INDIA: ITAT DELETES NOTIONAL ROYALTY ADDITIONS 
  5. ITAT SLAMS INCOME TAX DEPT. FOR ON THIRD-PARTY STATEMENTS WITHOUT INDEPENDENT INQUIRY
  6. ITAT REMANDS RS. 1.47 CRORE ADDITION OVER UNEXPLAINED CASH DEPOSITS UNDER S. 69A

Others

  1. ICAI RELEASES SECOND EDITION OF “BASICS OF PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT (INDIA PERSPECTIVE)”
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Change in Salary or Pension, Centre Revises Accounting Rules From FY 2027-28

The Finance Ministry has introduced a comprehensive overhaul of the government expenditure classification framework....

Ghaziabad DGGI | Online Gaming GST Fraud: Meerut Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Alleged Operator of Dummy Firms

The Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut, has rejected the anticipatory bail application...

CA Can’t Be Taxed on Client Funds Used for Statutory Payments: ITAT Deletes Rs. 29.87 Crore Addition

The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that CA can’t...

Ahmedabad Customs Seizes Gold Chain Hooks Worth Rs. 60.24 Lakh Concealed by Sharjah Passenger; Arrest Made

Customs officials at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport (SVPI), Ahmedabad, have seized 600.240 grams...

More like this

No Change in Salary or Pension, Centre Revises Accounting Rules From FY 2027-28

The Finance Ministry has introduced a comprehensive overhaul of the government expenditure classification framework....

Ghaziabad DGGI | Online Gaming GST Fraud: Meerut Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Alleged Operator of Dummy Firms

The Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut, has rejected the anticipatory bail application...

CA Can’t Be Taxed on Client Funds Used for Statutory Payments: ITAT Deletes Rs. 29.87 Crore Addition

The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that CA can’t...