HomeCase CompilationJURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : FEBRUARY 28, 2026

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : FEBRUARY 28, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for February 28, 2026.

GST

  1. DGGI HYDERABAD ARRESTS FINO PAYMENTS BANK MD RISHI GUPTA
  2. GST ARREST OVER BUSINESS PARTNER ISSUE TRIGGERS OVERREACH CONCERNS; FINANCE MINISTER ASSURES REVIEW

Service Tax

  1. SERVICE TAX EXEMPTION TO FOREIGN EMBASSIES: DELHI HC RULES REMAND FOR CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION RAISES NO SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW
  2. SERVICE TAX TAXABILITY APPEALS MUST GO DIRECTLY TO SUPREME COURT: DELHI HC
  3. METRO EXCLUDED FROM THE PURVIEW OF SERVICE TAX EXEMPTION AVAILABLE TO RAILWAYS: CESTAT
  4. NO SERVICE TAX PAYABLE ON RURAL YOUTH SKILLING COURSES UNDER DDU-GKY: CESTAT
  5. CESTAT REFUSES TO CONSIDER CENVAT CREDIT CLAIMS CITING SERVICE TAX EVASION

Customs Duty

  1. CENTRE TO LAUNCH 30-DAY CUSTOMS DUTY DEFERMENT FOR ELIGIBLE MANUFACTURER-IMPORTERS FROM NEXT MONTH
  2. PANKAJ CHAUDHARY LAUNCHES INTERNATIONAL TRAVELLERS’ GUIDE TO SIMPLIFY BAGGAGE RULES, 2026 [DOWNLOAD NOW]

Income Tax

  1. ADDITIONAL INTEREST ON DELAYED INCOME TAX REFUND: DELHI HC ORDERS FRESH REVIEW IN MITSUI ENGINEERING CASE
  2. LACK OF REASONED ORDER ON FTS CLASSIFICATION INVALIDATES 10% TAX WITHHOLDING; DELHI HIGH COURT CUTS RATE TO 2%
  3. ITAT CAN’T ADJOURN MATTERS SINE-DIE SOLELY DUE TO PENDING APPEAL WITHOUT STAY: DELHI HC
  4. WHETHER DOCUSIGN’S E-SIGNATURE PAYMENTS QUALIFY AS ‘ROYALTY’ UNDER INDIA–US TREATY? DELHI HC CUTS TAX WITHHOLDING RATE
  5. INDEFINITE LOOKOUT CIRCULAR VIOLATES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AFTER TAX PROCEEDINGS CONCLUDE: DELHI HC
  6. DELHI HC QUASHES DRAFT TAX ASSESSMENT ORDER OVER PROCEDURAL LAPSE IN FACELESS PROCEEDINGS
  7. INCOME TAX DEPT. TO RELEASE OF SEIZED JEWELLERY AFTER 9 YEARS: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
  8. CBDT ASSIGNS ADDITIONAL CHARGES TO SENIOR INCOME TAX OFFICERS

Other

  1. DELHI HIGH COURT REVIVES DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST IRS OFFICER SAMEER WANKHEDE
  2. WILL FAILURE TO VIDEO-RECORD A SEARCH MAKE SEIZURE ILLEGAL? EXPERT OPINION ON S. 105, 185 & 176(3) BNSS
  3. FNPO URGES 8TH PAY COMMISSION TO MERGE 50% DA WITH BASIC PAY, SEEKS INTERIM RELIEF FROM JANUARY 2026
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor

The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...

Commercial Court Can’t Rewrite Arbitral Findings: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot substantially modify arbitral awards under the...

Supreme Court Saves Navi Mumbai Mall From Demolition, Orders K. Raheja to Pay Rs. 318.31 Crore for Regularisation

The Supreme Court has set aside a Bombay High Court direction that would have...

Centre Must Apply Mind Before Refusing VRS: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of IPS Officer’s Voluntary Retirement

The Supreme Court has held that while the Central Government has the final authority...

More like this

Supreme Court Grants Notional Promotion to Railway Doctor

The Supreme Court has held that failure to communicate Annual Confidential Report (ACR) entries,...

Commercial Court Can’t Rewrite Arbitral Findings: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that courts cannot substantially modify arbitral awards under the...

Supreme Court Saves Navi Mumbai Mall From Demolition, Orders K. Raheja to Pay Rs. 318.31 Crore for Regularisation

The Supreme Court has set aside a Bombay High Court direction that would have...