HomeVideosCRITICAL ANALYSIS RECOVERY UNDER GST AT THE TIME OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE...

CRITICAL ANALYSIS RECOVERY UNDER GST AT THE TIME OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE | Section 67 & 73 EXPLAINED

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

CRITICAL ANALYSIS RECOVERY UNDER GST AT THE TIME OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE | Section 67, & 73 EXPLAINED

This video deals with Instances of coercion, threats of arrest and forceful recovery of tax by officials during the time of search, inspection and investigation are often the subject of numerous writ petitions praying for a refund of the said amount. The issue is rooted in the interplay of the following provisions of the CGST Act.

This video deals in detail with the case laws and also with all the provisions including Section 67 empowering a tax officer not below the rank of a Joint Commissioner to authorise an officer of central tax to inspect, search and seize goods, documents or things; Section 73(5) and 74(5), allowing a person chargeable with tax to pay the amount of tax along with the interest before the service of a notice on the basis of his own ascertainment or as ascertained by the proper officer; and Section 79 providing the mode of recovery of unpaid tax. I

t is pertinent to note that voluntary payment before the issuance of a show cause notice under Sections 74(5) and 74(5) is mostly done through submitting Form DRC-03 on the GST Portal.

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Clandestine Removal Can’t Be Proven Solely Through Pen Drives: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 1 Crore+ Excise Duty Demand

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Prototype Vehicles Must Be Valued on Comparable Goods Basis, CESTAT Rejects 110% Cost Valuation Demand

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Can GST Demands Orders Be Quashed If Issued by an Officer Lacking Monetary Jurisdiction?

A significant legal issue is emerging in GST litigation across India, with taxpayers increasingly...

DGGI Kolkata | Calcutta High Court Stays GST Assessment Order Over Alleged Violation of Natural Justice in DRC-01 Proceedings

The Calcutta High Court has granted interim relief to a real estate developer by...

More like this

Clandestine Removal Can’t Be Proven Solely Through Pen Drives: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 1 Crore+ Excise Duty Demand

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Prototype Vehicles Must Be Valued on Comparable Goods Basis, CESTAT Rejects 110% Cost Valuation Demand

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Can GST Demands Orders Be Quashed If Issued by an Officer Lacking Monetary Jurisdiction?

A significant legal issue is emerging in GST litigation across India, with taxpayers increasingly...