Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTCBI apprehends Superintendent, CGST, UP Amroha, Tax Advocate while accepting illegal gratification...

CBI apprehends Superintendent, CGST, UP Amroha, Tax Advocate while accepting illegal gratification of Rs. 1 Lakh

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has apprehended two accused including Superintendent of CGST, Amroha (UP) and a Tax Advocate while accepting illegal gratification of Rs. 1,00,000/- (as the 1st installment of demanded undue advantage of Rs. 4 Lakh) from the complainant.

A case was registered by CBI on 09.06.2025 on the basis of a complaint against the two said accused. The Complainant controls the business affairs of his family concern private company. The allegation in the complaint was that the accused Superintendent had issued penalty notice to the complainant’s family concern private company  on account of non-filing of GST returns. It was alleged that both accused had demanded undue advantage of Rs. 4 lakh from the complainant for waiving off penalty on the private company.

The Accused is posted as Superintendent, CGST, Gajrola having additional charge of Superintendent, CGST, Amroha. The Tax Advocate was representing the Complainant. However, the Tax  Advocate entered into conspiracy with Superintendent, CGST, Amroha and pressurized the complainant to deliver the demand of undue advantage of Rs. 4 Lakh to the accused Superintendent.

CBI laid a trap and caught both the accused red-handed.

Searches are being conducted at the premises of the accused at Amroha and Gajrola, UP.

Investigation is continuing.

Click Here To Read Press Release

Read More: ITR Filing 2025: No More HRA Exemption for Fake Rent Deals with Parents—Landlord’s PAN Now Mandatory

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Are GST Orders Passed After the Hearing Date Invalid? GSTAT Split Sends Issue to Larger Bench

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Prayagraj Bench, has delivered a split...

Quashing Income Tax Search Doesn’t Automatically Invalidate Case Transfer Or Subsequent Notices: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that setting aside an income tax...

Excess Excise Duty Must Be Adjusted Against Short-Payment When Final Assessment Is Based on Annual Costing: Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has set aside a central excise duty demand of ₹1.16...

Berry Ratio Inapplicable To Jewellery Manufacturer: ITAT Deletes Rs. 105.06 Crore Transfer Pricing Adjustments 

The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted transfer pricing...

More like this

Are GST Orders Passed After the Hearing Date Invalid? GSTAT Split Sends Issue to Larger Bench

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Prayagraj Bench, has delivered a split...

Quashing Income Tax Search Doesn’t Automatically Invalidate Case Transfer Or Subsequent Notices: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that setting aside an income tax...

Excess Excise Duty Must Be Adjusted Against Short-Payment When Final Assessment Is Based on Annual Costing: Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has set aside a central excise duty demand of ₹1.16...