Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationQRMP Taxpayers Can Now File Refund Applications on GST Portal: GSTN

QRMP Taxpayers Can Now File Refund Applications on GST Portal: GSTN

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has issued the advisory on system validation for filing of refund applications on GST portal for Quarterly Return Monthly Payment (QRMP) Taxpayers.

In the month of May 2025, a system-level validation was deployed on the GST Portal to ensure adherence to the provisions outlined in Para 6 of Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019. As per the said circular: 

“Any refund claim for a tax period may be filed only after furnishing all the returns in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-3B which were due to be furnished on or before the date on which the refund application is being filed. However, in case of a claim for refund filed by a composition taxpayer, a non-resident taxable person, or an Input Service Distributor (ISD), furnishing of returns in FORM GSTR-1 and FORM GSTR-3B is not required. Instead, the applicant should have furnished returns in FORM GSTR-4 (along with FORM GST CMP-08), FORM GSTR-5 or FORM GSTR-6, as the case may be, which were due to be furnished on or before the date on which the refund application is being filed.”

Accordingly, the GST system was updated to allow refund applications only if the taxpayer had filed all relevant returns that were due up to the date of filing the refund application. 

Post implementation of the validation, it was observed that taxpayers registered under the Quarterly Return Monthly Payment (QRMP) scheme encountered issues while attempting to file refund applications. Specifically, the system was not recognizing invoices furnished using the Invoice Furnishing Facility (IFF) for the first two months of the quarter (M1 and M2), resulting in the inability to proceed with refund filing. Additionally, in cases where GSTR-1 for the previous quarter had already been filed, the system was erroneously prompting taxpayers to file returns for M1 and M2 of the current quarter too. Taxpayers were facing this issue when the refund application was being submitted during the period between the two quarters. 

This is to inform the taxpayers that the aforementioned technical issue has now been resolved. Taxpayers under the QRMP scheme can now file refund applications for the invoices for which GSTR-3B has been already filed. Please note invoices furnished through IFF for which GSTR-3B is yet to be filed in coming return period should not be included in the refund application.

All taxpayers are advised to ensure that relevant returns are filed prior to filing a refund application, as per the legal provisions and existing system validations. 

In case of any discrepancies or system-related queries, taxpayers may reach out to the GST Helpdesk (https://selfservice.gstsystem.in)

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 23 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 23, 2026.GSTMere Opting For Longer Route...

Hindu Widow’s Property Right Can Become Absolute Without Partition: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a widow’s failure to seek partition does not,...

Indian Marriage Doesn’t Automatically Bar Divorce Proceedings Abroad: Supreme Court Quashes Injunction Against UK Case

The Supreme Court has held that an Indian court cannot restrain a spouse from...

Missing Original Document Doesn’t Automatically Defeat Forgery Case: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the absence of an original document alleged to...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 23 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 23, 2026.GSTMere Opting For Longer Route...

Hindu Widow’s Property Right Can Become Absolute Without Partition: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a widow’s failure to seek partition does not,...

Indian Marriage Doesn’t Automatically Bar Divorce Proceedings Abroad: Supreme Court Quashes Injunction Against UK Case

The Supreme Court has held that an Indian court cannot restrain a spouse from...