Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationMP S. Venkatesan Urges President to Intervene Against CAG's Move to Invite...

MP S. Venkatesan Urges President to Intervene Against CAG’s Move to Invite Private CA Firms for Audits

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

S. Venkatesan, Member of Parliament from Madurai, Tamil Nadu, has written to President Droupadi Murmu, raising serious concerns over a recent decision by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India to invite private Chartered Accountant (CA) firms to assist in auditing public sector and local bodies.

In a strongly worded letter dated June 3, 2025, Venkatesan expressed alarm over what he described as a move that could “dilute the independence” of the constitutional body and go against the principles laid down by the Constitution of India. He called the CAG’s tender notice for private CA firms “shocking” and warned that such outsourcing of audits could lead to violations of the constitutional mandate and compromise the integrity of sensitive government information.

“The CAG is accountable only to Parliament and was given independent status under the Constitution to ensure unbiased auditing without political interference,” the letter stated.

Venkatesan argued that the involvement of private firms in audits involving thousands of crores of rupees could lead to serious consequences, including the leakage of confidential data.

Highlighting the legacy of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in granting the CAG independent status, the MP emphasized that entrusting private firms with audit responsibilities undermines the institution’s autonomy and sets a dangerous precedent.

“The officers of the CAG department possess specialized expertise in auditing government institutions. The audit conducted by CAs is not the same as that conducted by the CAG,” Venkatesan added.

He concluded the letter by urging the President to intervene immediately and advise the CAG to withdraw the tender, emphasizing the need to preserve the distinct and independent character of the CAG in order to safeguard public finances.

The move by the CAG has sparked debate in public and political circles, with many echoing concerns over transparency, accountability, and constitutional propriety.

Read More: ICAI Eases Disciplinary Penalty For CA Guilty Of Professional Misconduct: Lifetime Ban Reduced to 10-Year Suspension

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...

Can Foreign Assets Be Assessed for AY 2018–19 When the First Black Money Act Notice Was Issued in FY 2018–19? Karnataka High Court Says...

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an assessment concerning two properties in Morocco after...

More like this

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...