HomeOther LawsBribery Allegations in Bail Cases: Delhi Special Judge Transferred 

Bribery Allegations in Bail Cases: Delhi Special Judge Transferred 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A special judge in Delhi has been transferred after the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) raised serious allegations involving bribery in exchange for granting bail. The judge, who previously handled cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act at the Rouse Avenue Court, is now under scrutiny for allegedly facilitating bail orders in return for large sums of money.

Bribery Complaints Trigger Investigation

The issue came to light in January 2025, when the ACB received multiple complaints from families of accused individuals. The complainants alleged that the judge, along with a court staffer, sought bribes ranging from ₹15 lakh to ₹1 crore for favorable bail decisions.

The Delhi High Court was alerted and initially reviewed the matter. Although the court found the available material insufficient for disciplinary action at the time, it authorized the ACB to continue investigating.

FIR Filed Against Court Clerk

Following further inquiries, the ACB lodged an FIR on May 16, 2025 against the concerned court reader (clerk) under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The FIR references a communication made by the Delhi High Court that paved the way for deeper investigation.

Judge Transferred Shortly After FIR

Just four days after the FIR, the Delhi High Court transferred the judge on May 20, raising questions about administrative action taken in response to the bribery allegations. While the court has not cited the bribery accusations as the reason for the transfer, the timing has drawn significant public and media attention.

Investigation Ongoing, No Charges Yet

As of now, no charges have been officially framed against the judge, and the case is still under investigation. The ACB is reportedly examining call records, digital communications, and witness statements to establish the full scope of the alleged misconduct.

Read More: GSTAT Interview Questions

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Deputy Commissioner Competent to Issue GST Penalty Notice U/s 122: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has held that, under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services...

Fraud-Based Proceedings Must Show Material and Satisfaction: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST S. 74 Order for Lack of Reasons

The Allahabad High Court has quashed a GST demand order passed under Section 74(9)...

GST Tax and Penalty for Goods Transported Without E-Way Bill Upheld: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Allahabad High Court judgment upholding...

“I Sincerely Regret and Apologise”: BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra Addresses Law Students Amid Controversy

Amid the ongoing controversy involving law students, Bar Council of India Chairman and Senior...

More like this

Deputy Commissioner Competent to Issue GST Penalty Notice U/s 122: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has held that, under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services...

Fraud-Based Proceedings Must Show Material and Satisfaction: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST S. 74 Order for Lack of Reasons

The Allahabad High Court has quashed a GST demand order passed under Section 74(9)...

GST Tax and Penalty for Goods Transported Without E-Way Bill Upheld: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Allahabad High Court judgment upholding...