Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationDGFT Imposes Port Restrictions on Import of Goods from Bangladesh

DGFT Imposes Port Restrictions on Import of Goods from Bangladesh

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has introduced significant port restrictions on the import of specific goods from Bangladesh, as per DGFT Notification No. 07/2025-26 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), Ministry of Commerce & Industry. With immediate effect, these new restrictions are implemented through the insertion of Para 19 under the “General Notes Regarding Import Policy” in the ITC (HS), 2022 Schedule 1 (Import Policy).

In exercise of its powers under the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992, and in accordance with the Foreign Trade Policy 2023, the DGFT has notified that imports of several categories of goods from Bangladesh will now be subject to port-specific restrictions. These categories include ready-made garments (RMG), fruit-flavoured and carbonated drinks, processed food items such as baked goods, snacks, chips, and confectionery, cotton and cotton yarn waste, finished plastic and PVC goods (excluding raw materials for domestic industries), and wooden furniture.

Under the revised import policy, ready-made garments from Bangladesh are not permitted to enter through any land port. However, such imports are still allowed via Nhava Sheva and Kolkata seaports, offering limited maritime access. For other listed goods, including food and beverage items, cotton waste, plastics, and furniture, imports from Bangladesh are restricted through specific Land Customs Stations (LCSs) and Integrated Check Posts (ICPs) located in the Northeastern states of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram, as well as through Changrabandha and Fulbari in West Bengal.

Despite these restrictions, the notification clarifies that the revised import rules will not apply to the import of fish, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), edible oil, or crushed stone from Bangladesh. Furthermore, the restrictions do not affect transit exports from Bangladesh to Nepal and Bhutan through Indian territory.

According to the DGFT, this measure has been introduced to regulate and streamline the import of certain sensitive categories of goods from Bangladesh, ensuring better monitoring and compliance at designated ports. The notification was issued with the approval of the Minister of Commerce & Industry and signed by Ajay Bhadoo, Director General of Foreign Trade and Additional Secretary to the Government of India.

Notification Details

Notification No. 07/2025-26

Date: 17/05/2025

Read More: GST Day 2025: CBIC to Celebrate GST Pakhwada from June 16 to June 30 Across India

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...