HomeNotificationIndian Bank Exempted From S. 19(2) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949

Indian Bank Exempted From S. 19(2) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has notified the grant of an exemption to Indian Bank from the provisions of Section 19(2) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, allowing it to hold shares in excess of the statutory limit in ASREC (India) Limited.

Section 19(2) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 ordinarily restricts banking companies from holding shares in any company — whether as pledgee, mortgagee, or absolute owner — beyond 30% of either the paid-up share capital of the investee company or the bank’s own paid-up capital and reserves, whichever is lower. The provision is designed to prevent excessive exposure and potential risk concentration in a single entity, thereby ensuring prudent banking practices.

However, invoking its powers under Section 53(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and acting upon the recommendation of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Central Government has issued a special notification exempting Indian Bank from this restriction specifically with regard to its shareholding in ASREC (India) Limited. This exemption permits Indian Bank to continue holding shares in ASREC that exceed the statutory cap outlined under Section 19(2).

ASREC (India) Limited, a prominent asset reconstruction company, plays a key role in the financial ecosystem by acquiring and resolving stressed assets. Indian Bank’s increased stake is seen as a strategic move, potentially enhancing the bank’s ability to participate more actively in the distressed asset market.

Notification Details

F. No. 7/11/2022-BOA.I]

Date: 14th May, 2025

Read More: Product Support Service By Coal India For Import Of Goods Covered Under Customs Valuation Rules: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No CENVAT Credit Reversal on Materials Used in Works Contract; Not ‘Trading’ or Exempt Service: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has held that materials...

CESTAT Quashes Export Duty Assessment on Iron Ore Fines, Orders Remand for Violation of Natural Justice; Reaffirms Transaction Value Principle

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty on ‘Waste Mud’, Holds By-Product Not Excisable; Relies on Withdrawal of CBIC Circular and Prior Rulings

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that...

Consolidated GST SCN Across Multiple Financial Years Permissible: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has held that the issuance of consolidated or common show...

More like this

No CENVAT Credit Reversal on Materials Used in Works Contract; Not ‘Trading’ or Exempt Service: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, has held that materials...

CESTAT Quashes Export Duty Assessment on Iron Ore Fines, Orders Remand for Violation of Natural Justice; Reaffirms Transaction Value Principle

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty on ‘Waste Mud’, Holds By-Product Not Excisable; Relies on Withdrawal of CBIC Circular and Prior Rulings

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that...