Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTDelhi High Court Directs Lifting Of Blocked ITC Held Beyond 1 Year

Delhi High Court Directs Lifting Of Blocked ITC Held Beyond 1 Year

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has held that the credit ledger cannot be blocked beyond the period of one year, as stipulated under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta have observed that the blocking of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) shall be lifted in view of the fact that it has been more than one year. This is however independent of any other action that the adjudicating authority may have taken, in accordance with law, against the Petitioner.

The petitioner, Shri Sai Ram Enterprises challenged the blocking of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs. 3,91,23,722 by the Deputy Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Gurugram.

The Petitioner contended that the blocking of the ITC took place for the period 1st January, 2024 to 31st November, 2024 but even at present, i.e., as on April, 2025, the same has not been unblocked.

The Petitioner relied upon Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 which lays down the conditions of use of amount available in electronic credit ledger.

The department contended that the blocking may be due to the allegation of the Petitioner being a non-existing firm. However, he concedes to the fact that there can be no doubt that the blocking is for a period of one year.

The court while disposing of the petition lifted the blocking of the ITC.

Case Details

Case Title: Shri Sai Ram Enterprieses Versus Pr. Adg, Dggi, Gurugram & Anr.

Case No.: W.P.(C) 5438/2025 and CM APPL No. 24762/2025 & 24763/2025

Date: 23/04/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Jitin Singhal

Counsel For Respondent: Harpreet Singh

Read More: Adjournment On Medical Grounds Must Be Considered Empathetically By GST Dept.: Delhi High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Investors Not Named in Trust Deed: Supreme Court Rejects CBDT Appeal Against Tax Relief 

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) challenge to...

India’s $112 Billion Trade Gap With China Exposes Manufacturing Dependence

India’s success in reducing toy imports has shown how targeted customs duties and quality...

Disputed GST Hearing Notice Must Be Examined in Appeal; Writ Relief Declined Despite Gaps in 100% Penalty Order: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with an ex parte GST adjudication...

GST Notice Limitation: Supreme Court Issues Notice On How 3 Month Period Must Be Calculated

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a petition challenging a Gauhati High Court...

More like this

Investors Not Named in Trust Deed: Supreme Court Rejects CBDT Appeal Against Tax Relief 

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) challenge to...

India’s $112 Billion Trade Gap With China Exposes Manufacturing Dependence

India’s success in reducing toy imports has shown how targeted customs duties and quality...

Disputed GST Hearing Notice Must Be Examined in Appeal; Writ Relief Declined Despite Gaps in 100% Penalty Order: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with an ex parte GST adjudication...