Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTHajmola Candy Erupts GST Classification Battle Between Dabur and DGGI

Hajmola Candy Erupts GST Classification Battle Between Dabur and DGGI

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Dabur India’s iconic Hajmola candy is currently under the scanner of the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Coimbatore Zone, over a tax classification dispute.

The core issue revolves around whether Hajmola should be taxed at 12% GST as an Ayurvedic medicine or at 18% GST as a confectionery product.

Dabur has maintained that Hajmola is an Ayurvedic formulation, a position previously upheld by the Supreme Court prior to the implementation of GST. The apex court had ruled that Hajmola should be treated as an Ayurvedic medicine and not merely as a candy or toffee. The outcome of the current investigation will determine whether the government continues with the lower GST rate or shifts Hajmola into a higher tax slab.

Tax experts say such classification disputes ultimately rest with the GST Council’s interpretation and guidelines. Notably, Dabur is already facing a GST demand of ₹320.6 crore, which the company is expected to challenge.

This development has also impacted Dabur’s stock performance. On April 11, shares of the company closed nearly 1% lower at ₹461.3 on the BSE. Over the past two weeks, the stock has declined by almost 9%.

The final resolution of this case could set a precedent for similar disputes in the FMCG sector, where the line between traditional medicine and food products continues to blur under GST norms.

Read More: IOCL Is PSU, No Intent To Evade Excise Duty Can Be Alleged: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 15 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 15, 2026.GSTGSTAT UPHOLDS ITC REVERSAL FOR...

Investigation Deposit Can’t Be Treated as Excise Duty After Demand Is Set Aside: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has directed the tax...

FinMin Guarantees Zero Charges on RuPay Debit Card Payments and UPI Transactions Up to Rs. 2,000

The Finance Ministry has notified a no-charge rule for payments made through RuPay-powered debit...

Gold Without Foreign Markings Can’t Be Confiscated on Suspicion of Smuggling: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad, has set aside the...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 15 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 15, 2026.GSTGSTAT UPHOLDS ITC REVERSAL FOR...

Investigation Deposit Can’t Be Treated as Excise Duty After Demand Is Set Aside: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has directed the tax...

FinMin Guarantees Zero Charges on RuPay Debit Card Payments and UPI Transactions Up to Rs. 2,000

The Finance Ministry has notified a no-charge rule for payments made through RuPay-powered debit...