Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTITC Not Available On Share Buyback Expenses: AAR

ITC Not Available On Share Buyback Expenses: AAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has ruled that the Input Tax Credit (ITC)  is not available on share buyback expenses.

The bench of P.B. Meena and Kamal Shukla has observed that the applicant is not eligible to avail the ITC involved in the expenditure incurred for buyback of its share and also required to reverse the ITC on common inputs and input services used in relation to the expenditure incurred for buyback of share.

The applicant, Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited, is a public limited company as per the Companies Act, 2013 and its shares are listed on the stock exchange. They had initiated a share buyback programme in December 2023. They are eligible for ITC on the expenditure incurred towards buyback of its shares; that the buyback of shares is an activity undertaken in the course or furtherance of business.

The applicant has further stated that buyback of shares improves company’s financial standing, creates value for shareholders, contributes prestige & promotes the Company’s image, reduces equity capital, leads to improved shareholders return; that it is a simple way to pay off investors & reduce the overall cost of capital. Thus, buyback extends beyond just acquiring shares.

The applicant sought the advance ruling on the issue whether the expenditure incurred by the applicant, a listed entity, for the buyback of its shares in the course of furtherance of business, is eligible for Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the GST regime?

The applicant’s argument is that the expenses incurred towards the buyback of shares is in the course or furtherance of the business activity and therefore, should be considered as eligible expenditure for the purpose of ITC.

The AAR held that The term ‘securities’ is excluded from both goods and services. The primary requirement for availability of ITC is not met.

Ruling Details

Applicant Name: Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited

Date: 25/03/2025

Read More: No GST Exemption On Supply Of Dredging Services To Gujarat Maritime Board: AAR

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

R. 96(10) Omitted Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST SCN and Consequential Orders

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice issued under Section...

Rs. 97.26 Lakh ITC Demand Raised Through GST Refund Order Without Prior Show-Cause Process Stayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has stayed a ₹97,26,820 input tax credit (ITC) demand raised...

GSTAT Directs Deputy Commissioner to Attend Hearing After Dept. Representatives Fail to Check Taxpayer’s Reply

The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Delhi Bench has criticised departmental representatives for appearing at...

More like this

R. 96(10) Omitted Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST SCN and Consequential Orders

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice issued under Section...

Rs. 97.26 Lakh ITC Demand Raised Through GST Refund Order Without Prior Show-Cause Process Stayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has stayed a ₹97,26,820 input tax credit (ITC) demand raised...